TIPOLOGI KELUARGA DI WILAYAH PERDESAAN DAN PERKOTAAN
| Main Author: | Sunarti, Euis; Departemen Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen Fakultas Ekologi Manusia Institut Pertanian Bogor |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article info application/pdf eJournal |
| Bahasa: | eng |
| Terbitan: |
Department of Family and Consumer Sciences
, 2013
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jikk/article/view/7704 http://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jikk/article/view/7704/5968 |
| ctrlnum |
article-7704 |
|---|---|
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><title lang="en-US">TIPOLOGI KELUARGA DI WILAYAH PERDESAAN DAN PERKOTAAN</title><creator>Sunarti, Euis; Departemen Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen
Fakultas Ekologi Manusia
Institut Pertanian Bogor</creator><subject lang="en-US">family typology; rural areas; urban areas</subject><description lang="en-US">This study aimed to analyze the differences in the typology of families living in rural and urban areas. This explanatory study involving 240 families (each of 120 families in rural and urban areas) were selected by stratified disproportional random sampling of eight villages in four districts of Bogor regency and municipality. Family tipology includes four dimensions (regenerative, resilient, rhythmic, and ritualistic), which was built by eight indicator and produced 16 family typology. Instrument on family typology developed by referring McCubbin &amp; Thompson (1987), and the data were analyzed by descriptive and inference (the relationship and difference test). Different test results showed that in general, urban families had a better typology than families in rural areas. The proportion of families according to rhythmic and ritualistic dimension in urban areas were higher than in rural areas. Nest structure analysis showed that only a quarter of the family that had four best typology (regenerative, resilient, rhythmic, and ritualistic). Based on this research, it is important for the government to improve family resilience and empowerment programs.</description><publisher lang="en-US">Department of Family and Consumer Sciences</publisher><contributor lang="en-US"/><date>2013-05-01</date><type>Journal:Article</type><type>Other:info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</type><type>Other:</type><type>File:application/pdf</type><identifier>http://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jikk/article/view/7704</identifier><identifier>10.24156/jikk.2013.6.2.73</identifier><source lang="en-US">Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen; Vol 6, No 2 (2013): Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen; 73-81</source><source>2502-3594</source><source>1907-6037</source><language>eng</language><relation>http://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jikk/article/view/7704/5968</relation><recordID>article-7704</recordID></dc>
|
| language |
eng |
| format |
Journal:Article Journal Other:info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Other Other: File:application/pdf File Journal:eJournal |
| author |
Sunarti, Euis; Departemen Ilmu Keluarga dan Konsumen
Fakultas Ekologi Manusia
Institut Pertanian Bogor |
| title |
TIPOLOGI KELUARGA DI WILAYAH PERDESAAN DAN PERKOTAAN |
| publisher |
Department of Family and Consumer Sciences |
| publishDate |
2013 |
| topic |
family typology rural areas urban areas |
| url |
http://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jikk/article/view/7704 http://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jikk/article/view/7704/5968 |
| contents |
This study aimed to analyze the differences in the typology of families living in rural and urban areas. This explanatory study involving 240 families (each of 120 families in rural and urban areas) were selected by stratified disproportional random sampling of eight villages in four districts of Bogor regency and municipality. Family tipology includes four dimensions (regenerative, resilient, rhythmic, and ritualistic), which was built by eight indicator and produced 16 family typology. Instrument on family typology developed by referring McCubbin & Thompson (1987), and the data were analyzed by descriptive and inference (the relationship and difference test). Different test results showed that in general, urban families had a better typology than families in rural areas. The proportion of families according to rhythmic and ritualistic dimension in urban areas were higher than in rural areas. Nest structure analysis showed that only a quarter of the family that had four best typology (regenerative, resilient, rhythmic, and ritualistic). Based on this research, it is important for the government to improve family resilience and empowerment programs. |
| id |
IOS1513.article-7704 |
| institution |
Institut Pertanian Bogor |
| institution_id |
20 |
| institution_type |
library:university library |
| library |
Perpustakaan Institut Pertanian Bogor |
| library_id |
96 |
| collection |
Jurnal Ilmu Keluarga & Konsumen |
| repository_id |
1513 |
| city |
BOGOR |
| province |
JAWA BARAT |
| repoId |
IOS1513 |
| first_indexed |
2016-09-22T20:48:46Z |
| last_indexed |
2017-05-31T07:32:02Z |
| recordtype |
dc |
| merged_child_boolean |
1 |
| _version_ |
1722681792935231488 |
| score |
17.607244 |