PENILAIAN DAUR HIDUP BOTOL PET (POLYETHYLENA TEREPHTALATE) PADA PRODUK MINUMAN LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA) OF PET (POLYETHYLENA TEREPHTALATE) BOTTLES FOR DRINKING PRODUCT

Main Author: Yani, Mohamad
Format: Article info application/pdf eJournal
Bahasa: eng
Terbitan: Environmental Research Center (PPLH) of Udayana University , 2013
Subjects:
PET
Online Access: https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/blje/article/view/6647
https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/blje/article/view/6647/5080
ctrlnum article-6647
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?> <dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><title lang="en-US">PENILAIAN DAUR HIDUP BOTOL PET (POLYETHYLENA TEREPHTALATE) PADA PRODUK MINUMAN LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA) OF PET (POLYETHYLENA TEREPHTALATE) BOTTLES FOR DRINKING PRODUCT</title><creator>Yani, Mohamad</creator><subject lang="en-US">Keyword: Life cycle assessment (LCA), PET, recycle, environmental impact</subject><description lang="en-US">AbstractThe use of PET packaging in drinking products has increased and shifted glass packaging,so it is necessary to study the life-cycle of PET packaging. This research aims to evaluate lifecycle of PET bottles on tea beverage products. This life-cycle assessment includes productionprocess, inventory, environmental impact, and cost analysis. The life cycle of PET bottle inIndonesia is not complete. The relationship between PET bottle manufacturers, drinkingmanufacturers, and recycling waste, are unidirectional. The recycled waste-PET used forother products. Based on the analysis of inventory, PET bottles 600ml is nedeed 28g resin/bottles and energy. The PET packaging production still produced a high defective product.Environmental impact assessment of PET bottle production indicates that the ambient airquality, noise and waste water are still good. The impact of PET bottle plant produce aglobal warming potential, reduce ozone layer and acid rain. The cost analysis describethat selling price of PET bottles is half the price of a glass bottle, while the price of waste-PET flake is three times higher than cullet. Although PET packaging is considered morepractical, cheap and saving, but the recycling of PET packaging has not been widelyutilized.</description><publisher lang="en-US">Environmental Research Center (PPLH) of Udayana University</publisher><date>2013-07-01</date><type>Journal:Article</type><type>Other:info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</type><type>File:application/pdf</type><identifier>https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/blje/article/view/6647</identifier><source lang="en-US">Bumi Lestari Journal of Environment; Vol 13 No 2 (2013)</source><source lang="id-ID">Bumi Lestari Journal of Environment; Vol 13 No 2 (2013)</source><source>2527-6158</source><source>1411-9668</source><language>eng</language><relation>https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/blje/article/view/6647/5080</relation><recordID>article-6647</recordID></dc>
language eng
format Journal:Article
Journal
Other:info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Other
File:application/pdf
File
Journal:eJournal
author Yani, Mohamad
title PENILAIAN DAUR HIDUP BOTOL PET (POLYETHYLENA TEREPHTALATE) PADA PRODUK MINUMAN LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA) OF PET (POLYETHYLENA TEREPHTALATE) BOTTLES FOR DRINKING PRODUCT
publisher Environmental Research Center (PPLH) of Udayana University
publishDate 2013
topic Keyword: Life cycle assessment (LCA)
PET
recycle
environmental impact
url https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/blje/article/view/6647
https://ojs.unud.ac.id/index.php/blje/article/view/6647/5080
contents AbstractThe use of PET packaging in drinking products has increased and shifted glass packaging,so it is necessary to study the life-cycle of PET packaging. This research aims to evaluate lifecycle of PET bottles on tea beverage products. This life-cycle assessment includes productionprocess, inventory, environmental impact, and cost analysis. The life cycle of PET bottle inIndonesia is not complete. The relationship between PET bottle manufacturers, drinkingmanufacturers, and recycling waste, are unidirectional. The recycled waste-PET used forother products. Based on the analysis of inventory, PET bottles 600ml is nedeed 28g resin/bottles and energy. The PET packaging production still produced a high defective product.Environmental impact assessment of PET bottle production indicates that the ambient airquality, noise and waste water are still good. The impact of PET bottle plant produce aglobal warming potential, reduce ozone layer and acid rain. The cost analysis describethat selling price of PET bottles is half the price of a glass bottle, while the price of waste-PET flake is three times higher than cullet. Although PET packaging is considered morepractical, cheap and saving, but the recycling of PET packaging has not been widelyutilized.
id IOS163.article-6647
institution Universitas Udayana
institution_id 28
institution_type library:university
library
library Perpustakaan Universitas Udayana
library_id 612
collection Bumi Lestari Journal of Environment
repository_id 163
subject_area Lingkungan
city BADUNG
province BALI
repoId IOS163
first_indexed 2016-09-24T07:12:29Z
last_indexed 2019-05-02T14:52:23Z
recordtype dc
_version_ 1722437852148531200
score 17.60897