Is it worth the effort? Spread and management success of invasive alien plant species in a Central European National Park

Main Authors: Schiffleithner, Verena, Essl, Franz
Format: Article Journal
Terbitan: , 2016
Subjects:
Online Access: https://zenodo.org/record/154026
ctrlnum 154026
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?> <dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><creator>Schiffleithner, Verena</creator><creator>Essl, Franz</creator><date>2016-09-14</date><description>The management of invasive alien species (IAS) in protected areas has become increasingly important in recent years. In this study, we analyse IAS management in the bilateral National Park Thayatal-Podyj&#xED; at the Austrian-Czech border. Based on two surveys from the years 2001 and 2010 and on annual management data from 2001-2010 we analyse changes in distribution and the efficiency of IAS management of three invasive alien plants (Fallopia &#xD7; bohemica, Impatiens glandulifera, Robinia pseudoacacia). In 2010, the three study species had invaded 161 ha (2%) of the study area. Despite a decade of management, F. &#xD7; bohemica has become widespread, whereas I. glandulifera distribution has decreased strongly. The most widespread species, R. pseudoacacia, has declined substantially in cover, but the area invaded has increased. From 2001 to 2010, annual management effort declined by about half. Management effort per hectare and decade was highest for F. &#xD7; bohemica (2,657 hours), followed by R. pseudoacacia (1,473 hours) and I. glandulifera (270 hours). Management effort for achieving the same amount of reduction in population size and cover was highest for R. pseudoacacia, followed by F. &#xD7; bohemica and I. glandulifera. We conclude that substantial effort and resources are necessary to successfully manage the study species and have to be provided over prolonged time periods, and thus continued management of these species is recommended. We highly recommend a systematic approach for monitoring the efficiency of IAS management projects in protected areas.</description><identifier>https://zenodo.org/record/154026</identifier><identifier>10.3897/neobiota.31.8071</identifier><identifier>oai:zenodo.org:154026</identifier><relation>url:https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit</relation><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</rights><source>NeoBiota 31 43-61</source><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>eradication</subject><subject>floodplains</subject><subject>invasion</subject><subject>monitoring</subject><subject>nature conservation</subject><subject>protected areas</subject><title>Is it worth the effort? Spread and management success of invasive alien plant species in a Central European National Park</title><type>Journal:Article</type><type>Journal:Article</type><recordID>154026</recordID></dc>
format Journal:Article
Journal
Journal:Journal
author Schiffleithner, Verena
Essl, Franz
title Is it worth the effort? Spread and management success of invasive alien plant species in a Central European National Park
publishDate 2016
topic Conservation
eradication
floodplains
invasion
monitoring
nature conservation
protected areas
url https://zenodo.org/record/154026
contents The management of invasive alien species (IAS) in protected areas has become increasingly important in recent years. In this study, we analyse IAS management in the bilateral National Park Thayatal-Podyjí at the Austrian-Czech border. Based on two surveys from the years 2001 and 2010 and on annual management data from 2001-2010 we analyse changes in distribution and the efficiency of IAS management of three invasive alien plants (Fallopia × bohemica, Impatiens glandulifera, Robinia pseudoacacia). In 2010, the three study species had invaded 161 ha (2%) of the study area. Despite a decade of management, F. × bohemica has become widespread, whereas I. glandulifera distribution has decreased strongly. The most widespread species, R. pseudoacacia, has declined substantially in cover, but the area invaded has increased. From 2001 to 2010, annual management effort declined by about half. Management effort per hectare and decade was highest for F. × bohemica (2,657 hours), followed by R. pseudoacacia (1,473 hours) and I. glandulifera (270 hours). Management effort for achieving the same amount of reduction in population size and cover was highest for R. pseudoacacia, followed by F. × bohemica and I. glandulifera. We conclude that substantial effort and resources are necessary to successfully manage the study species and have to be provided over prolonged time periods, and thus continued management of these species is recommended. We highly recommend a systematic approach for monitoring the efficiency of IAS management projects in protected areas.
id IOS16997.154026
institution ZAIN Publications
institution_id 7213
institution_type library:special
library
library Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies
library_id 5267
collection Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies
repository_id 16997
subject_area Multidisciplinary
city Stockholm
province INTERNASIONAL
shared_to_ipusnas_str 1
repoId IOS16997
first_indexed 2022-06-06T04:25:45Z
last_indexed 2022-06-06T04:25:45Z
recordtype dc
_version_ 1734902020358275072
score 17.610468