Sensitivity of two melt pond schemes to the uncertainties in atmospheric reanalyses for global climate models

Main Authors: Sterlin, Jean, Fichefet, Thierry, Massonnet, François, Lecomte, Olivier, Vancoppenolle, Martin
Format: Proceeding poster Journal
Bahasa: eng
Terbitan: , 2019
Subjects:
Online Access: https://zenodo.org/record/4545439
ctrlnum 4545439
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?> <dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><creator>Sterlin, Jean</creator><creator>Fichefet, Thierry</creator><creator>Massonnet, Fran&#xE7;ois</creator><creator>Lecomte, Olivier</creator><creator>Vancoppenolle, Martin</creator><date>2019-08-14</date><description>Melt ponds appear during the melt season in the Arctic, when the surface melt water collects in the depressions of the ice field. The albedo of the ponds is lower than the surrounding ice and snow areas, and for this reason the ponds are hot-spots for the ice-albedo feedback. There is two main approaches to represent the melt ponds in Global Climate Models. The first approach is empiric and relies on observations to determine the available water capacity of the ponds from the sea ice state. Then, a fraction of the surface melt water accumulates is the ponds. The second makes use of the Ice Thickness Distribution to infer the surface topography of the sea ice and distribute the melt water among the ice categories. Although the role of melt ponds has been extensively studied, less is known on the response of the ponds to climate change. Insights can be gained from using different reanalyses of the atmospheric surface state to force the ocean and ice components. Because of a lack of observations in remote areas, reanalyses still suffer from biases notably in the polar regions. The choice of a reanalysis has a strong influence on the representation of the sea ice state of the Antarctic. We expect similar deviations in the Northern Hemisphere. To evaluate the effect of the melt pond schemes on the sea ice when subject to uncertainties in the atmospheric state, we have run the empiric and topographic schemes forced with JRA-55, DFS 5.2, and NCEP/NCAR atmospheric reanalyses. From the simulations, We expect to see the degree of difference between the pond schemes and the influence of the forcing onto their climatic response. We will be able to assess the importance of the melt ponds for the climate and check the consistency of the parameterizations. This will allow us to formulate a recommendation on the use of melt ponds in climate models.</description><identifier>https://zenodo.org/record/4545439</identifier><identifier>10.5281/zenodo.4545439</identifier><identifier>oai:zenodo.org:4545439</identifier><language>eng</language><relation>info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/727862/</relation><relation>doi:10.5281/zenodo.4545438</relation><relation>url:https://zenodo.org/communities/applicate</relation><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</rights><subject>Melt ponds</subject><subject>Atmospheric reanalysis and forcing</subject><subject>Sea Ice Model</subject><subject>Ocean General Circulation Model</subject><subject>Arctic climate</subject><subject>Albedo</subject><title>Sensitivity of two melt pond schemes to the uncertainties in atmospheric reanalyses for global climate models</title><type>Journal:Proceeding</type><type>Other:poster</type><recordID>4545439</recordID></dc>
language eng
format Journal:Proceeding
Journal
Other:poster
Other
Journal:Journal
author Sterlin, Jean
Fichefet, Thierry
Massonnet, François
Lecomte, Olivier
Vancoppenolle, Martin
title Sensitivity of two melt pond schemes to the uncertainties in atmospheric reanalyses for global climate models
publishDate 2019
topic Melt ponds
Atmospheric reanalysis and forcing
Sea Ice Model
Ocean General Circulation Model
Arctic climate
Albedo
url https://zenodo.org/record/4545439
contents Melt ponds appear during the melt season in the Arctic, when the surface melt water collects in the depressions of the ice field. The albedo of the ponds is lower than the surrounding ice and snow areas, and for this reason the ponds are hot-spots for the ice-albedo feedback. There is two main approaches to represent the melt ponds in Global Climate Models. The first approach is empiric and relies on observations to determine the available water capacity of the ponds from the sea ice state. Then, a fraction of the surface melt water accumulates is the ponds. The second makes use of the Ice Thickness Distribution to infer the surface topography of the sea ice and distribute the melt water among the ice categories. Although the role of melt ponds has been extensively studied, less is known on the response of the ponds to climate change. Insights can be gained from using different reanalyses of the atmospheric surface state to force the ocean and ice components. Because of a lack of observations in remote areas, reanalyses still suffer from biases notably in the polar regions. The choice of a reanalysis has a strong influence on the representation of the sea ice state of the Antarctic. We expect similar deviations in the Northern Hemisphere. To evaluate the effect of the melt pond schemes on the sea ice when subject to uncertainties in the atmospheric state, we have run the empiric and topographic schemes forced with JRA-55, DFS 5.2, and NCEP/NCAR atmospheric reanalyses. From the simulations, We expect to see the degree of difference between the pond schemes and the influence of the forcing onto their climatic response. We will be able to assess the importance of the melt ponds for the climate and check the consistency of the parameterizations. This will allow us to formulate a recommendation on the use of melt ponds in climate models.
id IOS16997.4545439
institution ZAIN Publications
institution_id 7213
institution_type library:special
library
library Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies
library_id 5267
collection Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies
repository_id 16997
subject_area Multidisciplinary
city Stockholm
province INTERNASIONAL
shared_to_ipusnas_str 1
repoId IOS16997
first_indexed 2022-06-06T06:04:36Z
last_indexed 2022-06-06T06:04:36Z
recordtype dc
_version_ 1734907413736194048
score 17.60987