Data from: Flower resource and land management drives hoverfly communities and bee abundance in semi-natural and agricultural grasslands
| Main Authors: | Lucas, Andrew, Bull, James C., de Vere, Natasha, Neyland, Penelope J., Forman, Dan W. |
|---|---|
| Format: | info dataset Journal |
| Terbitan: |
, 2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
https://zenodo.org/record/4989716 |
| ctrlnum |
4989716 |
|---|---|
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><creator>Lucas, Andrew</creator><creator>Bull, James C.</creator><creator>de Vere, Natasha</creator><creator>Neyland, Penelope J.</creator><creator>Forman, Dan W.</creator><date>2018-07-14</date><description>1. Pollination is a key ecosystem service, and appropriate management, particularly in agricultural systems, is essential to maintain a diversity of pollinator guilds. However, management recommendations frequently focus on maintaining plant communities, with the assumption that associated invertebrate populations will be sustained. 2. We tested whether plant community, flower resources and soil moisture would influence hoverfly (Syrphidae) abundance and species richness in floristically-rich semi-natural and floristically-impoverished agricultural grassland communities in Wales (U.K.), and compared these to two Hymenoptera genera, Bombus and Lasioglossum. Interactions between environmental variables were tested using generalised linear modelling, and hoverfly community composition examined using canonical correspondence analysis. 3. There was no difference in hoverfly abundance, species richness, or bee abundance, between grassland types. There was a positive association between hoverfly abundance, species richness and flower abundance in unimproved grasslands. However, this was not evident in agriculturally improved grassland, possibly reflecting intrinsically low flower resource in these habitats, or the presence of plant species with low or relatively inaccessible nectar resources. There was no association between soil moisture content and hoverfly abundance or species richness. 4. Hoverfly community composition was influenced by agricultural improvement and the amount of flower resource. Hoverfly species with semi-aquatic larvae were associated with both semi-natural and agricultural wet grasslands, possibly because of localised larval habitat. Despite the absence of differences in hoverfly abundance and species-richness, distinct hoverfly communities are associated with marshy grasslands, agriculturally improved marshy grasslands and unimproved dry grasslands, but not with improved dry grasslands. 5. Grassland plant community cannot be used as a proxy for pollinator community. Management of grasslands should aim to maximise the pollinator feeding resource, as well as maintain plant communities. Retaining waterlogged ground may enhance the number of hoverflies with semi-aquatic larvae.</description><description>Lucas et al 2017 DataExcel file of insects recorded during study</description><identifier>https://zenodo.org/record/4989716</identifier><identifier>10.5061/dryad.1rd15</identifier><identifier>oai:zenodo.org:4989716</identifier><relation>doi:10.1002/ece3.3303</relation><relation>url:https://zenodo.org/communities/dryad</relation><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><rights>https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode</rights><subject>habitat management</subject><subject>hoverflies</subject><title>Data from: Flower resource and land management drives hoverfly communities and bee abundance in semi-natural and agricultural grasslands</title><type>Other:info:eu-repo/semantics/other</type><type>Other:dataset</type><recordID>4989716</recordID></dc>
|
| format |
Other:info:eu-repo/semantics/other Other Other:dataset Journal:Journal Journal |
| author |
Lucas, Andrew Bull, James C. de Vere, Natasha Neyland, Penelope J. Forman, Dan W. |
| title |
Data from: Flower resource and land management drives hoverfly communities and bee abundance in semi-natural and agricultural grasslands |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| topic |
habitat management hoverflies |
| url |
https://zenodo.org/record/4989716 |
| contents |
1. Pollination is a key ecosystem service, and appropriate management, particularly in agricultural systems, is essential to maintain a diversity of pollinator guilds. However, management recommendations frequently focus on maintaining plant communities, with the assumption that associated invertebrate populations will be sustained. 2. We tested whether plant community, flower resources and soil moisture would influence hoverfly (Syrphidae) abundance and species richness in floristically-rich semi-natural and floristically-impoverished agricultural grassland communities in Wales (U.K.), and compared these to two Hymenoptera genera, Bombus and Lasioglossum. Interactions between environmental variables were tested using generalised linear modelling, and hoverfly community composition examined using canonical correspondence analysis. 3. There was no difference in hoverfly abundance, species richness, or bee abundance, between grassland types. There was a positive association between hoverfly abundance, species richness and flower abundance in unimproved grasslands. However, this was not evident in agriculturally improved grassland, possibly reflecting intrinsically low flower resource in these habitats, or the presence of plant species with low or relatively inaccessible nectar resources. There was no association between soil moisture content and hoverfly abundance or species richness. 4. Hoverfly community composition was influenced by agricultural improvement and the amount of flower resource. Hoverfly species with semi-aquatic larvae were associated with both semi-natural and agricultural wet grasslands, possibly because of localised larval habitat. Despite the absence of differences in hoverfly abundance and species-richness, distinct hoverfly communities are associated with marshy grasslands, agriculturally improved marshy grasslands and unimproved dry grasslands, but not with improved dry grasslands. 5. Grassland plant community cannot be used as a proxy for pollinator community. Management of grasslands should aim to maximise the pollinator feeding resource, as well as maintain plant communities. Retaining waterlogged ground may enhance the number of hoverflies with semi-aquatic larvae. Lucas et al 2017 DataExcel file of insects recorded during study |
| id |
IOS16997.4989716 |
| institution |
ZAIN Publications |
| institution_id |
7213 |
| institution_type |
library:special library |
| library |
Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies |
| library_id |
5267 |
| collection |
Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies |
| repository_id |
16997 |
| subject_area |
Multidisciplinary |
| city |
Stockholm |
| province |
INTERNASIONAL |
| shared_to_ipusnas_str |
1 |
| repoId |
IOS16997 |
| first_indexed |
2022-06-06T05:24:36Z |
| last_indexed |
2022-06-06T05:24:36Z |
| recordtype |
dc |
| _version_ |
1734905162305110016 |
| score |
17.610363 |