Economic costs of biological invasions in Ecuador: the importance of the Galapagos Islands

Main Authors: Ballesteros-Mejia, Liliana, Angulo, Elena, Diagne, Christophe, Cooke, Brian, Nuñez, Martin A., Courchamp, Franck
Format: Article Journal
Terbitan: Pensoft Publishers , 2021
Subjects:
Online Access: https://zenodo.org/record/5166275
ctrlnum 5166275
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?> <dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><creator>Ballesteros-Mejia, Liliana</creator><creator>Angulo, Elena</creator><creator>Diagne, Christophe</creator><creator>Cooke, Brian</creator><creator>Nu&#xF1;ez, Martin A.</creator><creator>Courchamp, Franck</creator><date>2021-07-29</date><description>Biological invasions, as a result of human intervention through trade and mobility, are the second biggest cause of biodiversity loss. The impacts of invasive alien species (IAS) on the environment are well known, however, economic impacts are poorly estimated, especially in mega-diverse countries where both economic and ecological consequences of these effects can be catastrophic. Ecuador, one of the smallest mega-diverse countries, lacks a comprehensive description of the economic costs of IAS within its territory. Here, using "InvaCost", a public database that compiles all recorded monetary costs associated with IAS from English and Non-English sources, we investigated the economic costs of biological invasions. We found that between 1983 and 2017, the reported costs associated with biological invasions ranged between US$86.17 million (when considering only the most robust data) and US$626 million (when including all cost data) belonging to 37 species and 27 genera. Furthermore, 99% of the recorded cost entries were from the Galapagos Islands. From only robust data, the costliest identified taxonomic group was feral goats (Capra hircus; US$20 million), followed by Aedes mosquitoes (US$2.14 million) while organisms like plant species from the genus Rubus, a parasitic fly (Philornis downsi), black rats (Rattus rattus) and terrestrial gastropods (Achatina fulica) represented less than US$2 million each. Costs of "mixed-taxa" (i.e. plants and animals) represented the highest (61% of total robust costs; US$52.44 million). The most impacted activity sector was the national park authorities, which spent about US$84 million. Results from robust data also revealed that management expenditures were the major type of costs recorded in the Galapagos Islands; however, costs reported for medical losses related to Aedes mosquitoes causing dengue fever in mainland Ecuador would have ranked first if more detailed information had allowed us to categorize them as robust data. Over 70% of the IAS reported for Ecuador did not have reported costs. These results suggest that costs reported here are a massive underestimate of the actual economic toll of invasions in the country.</description><identifier>https://zenodo.org/record/5166275</identifier><identifier>10.3897/neobiota.67.59116</identifier><identifier>oai:zenodo.org:5166275</identifier><publisher>Pensoft Publishers</publisher><relation>doi:10.3897/neobiota.67.59116.suppl1</relation><relation>doi:10.3897/neobiota.67.59116.suppl2</relation><relation>url:https://zenodo.org/communities/biosyslit</relation><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</rights><source>NeoBiota 67 375-400</source><subject>Damages</subject><subject>economic costs</subject><subject>InvaCost</subject><subject>invasive alien species</subject><subject>mainland Ecuador</subject><subject>management</subject><title>Economic costs of biological invasions in Ecuador: the importance of the Galapagos Islands</title><type>Journal:Article</type><type>Journal:Article</type><recordID>5166275</recordID></dc>
format Journal:Article
Journal
Journal:Journal
author Ballesteros-Mejia, Liliana
Angulo, Elena
Diagne, Christophe
Cooke, Brian
Nuñez, Martin A.
Courchamp, Franck
title Economic costs of biological invasions in Ecuador: the importance of the Galapagos Islands
publisher Pensoft Publishers
publishDate 2021
topic Damages
economic costs
InvaCost
invasive alien species
mainland Ecuador
management
url https://zenodo.org/record/5166275
contents Biological invasions, as a result of human intervention through trade and mobility, are the second biggest cause of biodiversity loss. The impacts of invasive alien species (IAS) on the environment are well known, however, economic impacts are poorly estimated, especially in mega-diverse countries where both economic and ecological consequences of these effects can be catastrophic. Ecuador, one of the smallest mega-diverse countries, lacks a comprehensive description of the economic costs of IAS within its territory. Here, using "InvaCost", a public database that compiles all recorded monetary costs associated with IAS from English and Non-English sources, we investigated the economic costs of biological invasions. We found that between 1983 and 2017, the reported costs associated with biological invasions ranged between US$86.17 million (when considering only the most robust data) and US$626 million (when including all cost data) belonging to 37 species and 27 genera. Furthermore, 99% of the recorded cost entries were from the Galapagos Islands. From only robust data, the costliest identified taxonomic group was feral goats (Capra hircus; US$20 million), followed by Aedes mosquitoes (US$2.14 million) while organisms like plant species from the genus Rubus, a parasitic fly (Philornis downsi), black rats (Rattus rattus) and terrestrial gastropods (Achatina fulica) represented less than US$2 million each. Costs of "mixed-taxa" (i.e. plants and animals) represented the highest (61% of total robust costs; US$52.44 million). The most impacted activity sector was the national park authorities, which spent about US$84 million. Results from robust data also revealed that management expenditures were the major type of costs recorded in the Galapagos Islands; however, costs reported for medical losses related to Aedes mosquitoes causing dengue fever in mainland Ecuador would have ranked first if more detailed information had allowed us to categorize them as robust data. Over 70% of the IAS reported for Ecuador did not have reported costs. These results suggest that costs reported here are a massive underestimate of the actual economic toll of invasions in the country.
id IOS16997.5166275
institution ZAIN Publications
institution_id 7213
institution_type library:special
library
library Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies
library_id 5267
collection Cognizance Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies
repository_id 16997
subject_area Multidisciplinary
city Stockholm
province INTERNASIONAL
shared_to_ipusnas_str 1
repoId IOS16997
first_indexed 2022-06-06T05:49:26Z
last_indexed 2022-06-06T05:49:26Z
recordtype dc
_version_ 1734906606050607104
score 17.60897