Human impact overrides bioclimatic drivers of red fox home range size globally

Main Authors: Main, Michael, Davis, Robert, Blake, David, Mills, Harriet, Doherty, Tim
Format: info dataset eJournal
Terbitan: , 2021
Online Access: https://zenodo.org/record/3990746
ctrlnum 3990746
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?> <dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><creator>Main, Michael</creator><creator>Davis, Robert</creator><creator>Blake, David</creator><creator>Mills, Harriet</creator><creator>Doherty, Tim</creator><date>2021-04-30</date><description>Aim Identifying the variables that influence animal home range size is important for understanding the biological requirements of individuals and their social interactions. Given their often broad distributions, carnivores are model organisms for studying range-wide determinants of home range size. Here we test predictions about environmental determinants of home range size for one of the world's most widely distributed carnivores, the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). Location Global Methods We compiled a database of 70 mean home range estimates from 62 studies and four continents, which we analysed according to site-based temperature, precipitation, environmental productivity and human influence variables. Results We found a very strong negative effect of the Human Footprint Index (HFI), with fox home range size decreasing as the level of human impact increased. When analysing the constituent components of the HFI separately, we found that human population density was the only well supported variable (cf. built environments, croplands, pasture lands, nightlights, railways, roads and navigable waterways). Predicted home range size at the highest human population densities (0.75 km2) was 93% lower than at the lowest population densities (10.83 km2). We also found that home range size increased as mean annual temperature and temperature seasonality increased. The analyses did not support our prediction that home ranges would be smaller in areas of higher environmental productivity or precipitation. Main conclusions Smaller home range sizes observed in highly disturbed areas can be attributed to increased food availability from anthropogenic sources. The lack of an effect of environmental productivity contrasts with previous studies that have shown a negative relationship with carnivore home range size. It may be that anthropogenic food sources have negated the impacts that low productivity environments have on fox home ranges. Our results emphasise the strong potential for human activities to transform animal space use across the globe.</description><identifier>https://zenodo.org/record/3990746</identifier><identifier>10.5061/dryad.5mkkwh72w</identifier><identifier>oai:zenodo.org:3990746</identifier><relation>url:https://zenodo.org/communities/dryad</relation><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><rights>https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode</rights><title>Human impact overrides bioclimatic drivers of red fox home range size globally</title><type>Other:info:eu-repo/semantics/other</type><type>Other:dataset</type><recordID>3990746</recordID></dc>
format Other:info:eu-repo/semantics/other
Other
Other:dataset
Journal:eJournal
Journal
author Main, Michael
Davis, Robert
Blake, David
Mills, Harriet
Doherty, Tim
title Human impact overrides bioclimatic drivers of red fox home range size globally
publishDate 2021
url https://zenodo.org/record/3990746
contents Aim Identifying the variables that influence animal home range size is important for understanding the biological requirements of individuals and their social interactions. Given their often broad distributions, carnivores are model organisms for studying range-wide determinants of home range size. Here we test predictions about environmental determinants of home range size for one of the world's most widely distributed carnivores, the red fox (Vulpes vulpes). Location Global Methods We compiled a database of 70 mean home range estimates from 62 studies and four continents, which we analysed according to site-based temperature, precipitation, environmental productivity and human influence variables. Results We found a very strong negative effect of the Human Footprint Index (HFI), with fox home range size decreasing as the level of human impact increased. When analysing the constituent components of the HFI separately, we found that human population density was the only well supported variable (cf. built environments, croplands, pasture lands, nightlights, railways, roads and navigable waterways). Predicted home range size at the highest human population densities (0.75 km2) was 93% lower than at the lowest population densities (10.83 km2). We also found that home range size increased as mean annual temperature and temperature seasonality increased. The analyses did not support our prediction that home ranges would be smaller in areas of higher environmental productivity or precipitation. Main conclusions Smaller home range sizes observed in highly disturbed areas can be attributed to increased food availability from anthropogenic sources. The lack of an effect of environmental productivity contrasts with previous studies that have shown a negative relationship with carnivore home range size. It may be that anthropogenic food sources have negated the impacts that low productivity environments have on fox home ranges. Our results emphasise the strong potential for human activities to transform animal space use across the globe.
id IOS17403.3990746
institution Universitas PGRI Palembang
institution_id 189
institution_type library:university
library
library Perpustakaan Universitas PGRI Palembang
library_id 587
collection Marga Life in South Sumatra in the Past: Puyang Concept Sacrificed and Demythosized
repository_id 17403
city KOTA PALEMBANG
province SUMATERA SELATAN
repoId IOS17403
first_indexed 2022-07-26T01:26:29Z
last_indexed 2022-07-26T01:26:29Z
recordtype dc
_version_ 1739406527010177024
score 17.610468