Cover Image

ANALISIS YURIDIS SANKSI PIDANA KEKERASAN PSIKIS TERHADAP PEREMPUAN DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 23 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG PENGHAPUSAN KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA

Main Authors: ', IDAWATI, Artina, Dessy, ', Erdiansyah
Format: Article info application/pdf eJournal
Bahasa: eng
Terbitan: Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum , 2019
Online Access: https://jom.unri.ac.id/index.php/JOMFHUKUM/article/view/22102
https://jom.unri.ac.id/index.php/JOMFHUKUM/article/view/22102/21388
ctrlnum article-22102
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?> <dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><title lang="en-US">ANALISIS YURIDIS SANKSI PIDANA KEKERASAN PSIKIS TERHADAP PEREMPUAN DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 23 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG PENGHAPUSAN KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA</title><creator>', IDAWATI</creator><creator>Artina, Dessy</creator><creator>', Erdiansyah</creator><description lang="en-US">Domestic violence or what is known as domestic violence often occurs even though Law No. 23 of 2004 concerning the elimination of domestic violence (PKDRT) has occurred. Cases of domestic violence are increasing year by year, especially against women (wives). In domestic violence there is physical violence, psychological violence, sexual violence and economic violence.. The purpose of this thesis writing is: First, Regulation of criminal sanctions on psychic violence within the household based on Law Number 23 of 2004 concerning PKDRT, Second, Proof of victims of psychic violence according to Law Number 23 of 2004 concerning PKDRT, Third, An ideal regulation on criminal sanctions against victims of psychic violence according to Law Number 23 of 2004 concerning PKDRT.This type of research can be classified in the type of normative legal research, because in this study the authors conducted research by examining library materials. Data sources used are secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials.From the results of the research problem there are three main things that can be concluded. First, by referring to Article 10 of the Criminal Code, then in Law Number 23 of 2004 the sanctions imposed on perpetrators of psychic violence are imprisonment and fines. Additional crimes are not the same. Second, the most easily available evidence is "witness testimony, but in general the witness is a family of blood or an arbitration in a straight line, brother, husband or wife. But Article 168 of KUHAP does not allow. Third, the ideal regulation regarding criminal sanctions of psychic violence according to the PKDRT law is not yet appropriate, that the sanctions of psychological violence are made very low. Authors' advice: First, an optimal socialization of the PKDRT law so that the community knows that psychic violence can be criminalized and the impact is more dangerous to one's mental health. Second, the proof of the victims of psychic violence is most easily obtained through witness testimony, given that witnesses in this crime, generally are blood relatives or seminars in a straight line, relatives, husband or wife, according to article 168 of the Criminal Procedure Code, cannot be heard and can resign as a witness, it should be allowed in the PKDRT law. Third, it is better to impose sanctions on imprisonment and fine psychic violence in the PKDRT law. Keywords: Sanctions - Violence - Psychic</description><publisher lang="en-US">Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum</publisher><contributor lang="en-US"/><date>2019-02-13</date><type>Journal:Article</type><type>Other:info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</type><type>Other:</type><type>File:application/pdf</type><identifier>https://jom.unri.ac.id/index.php/JOMFHUKUM/article/view/22102</identifier><source lang="en-US">Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum; Vol 5, No 2 (2018): Juli - Desember; 1-12</source><source>2355-6781</source><language>eng</language><relation>https://jom.unri.ac.id/index.php/JOMFHUKUM/article/view/22102/21388</relation><rights lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2018 Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum</rights><recordID>article-22102</recordID></dc>
language eng
format Journal:Article
Journal
Other:info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Other
Other:
File:application/pdf
File
Journal:eJournal
author ', IDAWATI
Artina, Dessy
', Erdiansyah
title ANALISIS YURIDIS SANKSI PIDANA KEKERASAN PSIKIS TERHADAP PEREMPUAN DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 23 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG PENGHAPUSAN KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA
publisher Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum
publishDate 2019
url https://jom.unri.ac.id/index.php/JOMFHUKUM/article/view/22102
https://jom.unri.ac.id/index.php/JOMFHUKUM/article/view/22102/21388
contents Domestic violence or what is known as domestic violence often occurs even though Law No. 23 of 2004 concerning the elimination of domestic violence (PKDRT) has occurred. Cases of domestic violence are increasing year by year, especially against women (wives). In domestic violence there is physical violence, psychological violence, sexual violence and economic violence.. The purpose of this thesis writing is: First, Regulation of criminal sanctions on psychic violence within the household based on Law Number 23 of 2004 concerning PKDRT, Second, Proof of victims of psychic violence according to Law Number 23 of 2004 concerning PKDRT, Third, An ideal regulation on criminal sanctions against victims of psychic violence according to Law Number 23 of 2004 concerning PKDRT.This type of research can be classified in the type of normative legal research, because in this study the authors conducted research by examining library materials. Data sources used are secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials.From the results of the research problem there are three main things that can be concluded. First, by referring to Article 10 of the Criminal Code, then in Law Number 23 of 2004 the sanctions imposed on perpetrators of psychic violence are imprisonment and fines. Additional crimes are not the same. Second, the most easily available evidence is "witness testimony, but in general the witness is a family of blood or an arbitration in a straight line, brother, husband or wife. But Article 168 of KUHAP does not allow. Third, the ideal regulation regarding criminal sanctions of psychic violence according to the PKDRT law is not yet appropriate, that the sanctions of psychological violence are made very low. Authors' advice: First, an optimal socialization of the PKDRT law so that the community knows that psychic violence can be criminalized and the impact is more dangerous to one's mental health. Second, the proof of the victims of psychic violence is most easily obtained through witness testimony, given that witnesses in this crime, generally are blood relatives or seminars in a straight line, relatives, husband or wife, according to article 168 of the Criminal Procedure Code, cannot be heard and can resign as a witness, it should be allowed in the PKDRT law. Third, it is better to impose sanctions on imprisonment and fine psychic violence in the PKDRT law. Keywords: Sanctions - Violence - Psychic
id IOS1765.article-22102
institution Universitas Riau
institution_id 68
institution_type library:university
library
library Perpustakaan Universitas Riau
library_id 589
collection Jurnal Online Mahasiswa (JOM) Bidang Ilmu Hukum
repository_id 1765
subject_area Hukum
city KOTA PEKANBARU
province RIAU
repoId IOS1765
first_indexed 2019-05-20T19:13:17Z
last_indexed 2020-03-11T15:42:33Z
recordtype dc
_version_ 1722688354963685376
score 17.607244

Lihat Juga