Tinjauan hukum eksekusi objek jaminan fidusia pada debitur pailit studi kasus putusan Mahkamah Agung nomor 306 K/ PDT. SUS/ 2010 jo putusan pengadilan niaga jakarta pusat nomor 01/ PAILIT. LAIN -LAIN/ 2009 'PN. NIAGA.JKT.PST = Analysis on the execution of object of fiduciary guarantee on bankrupted debtor case study supreme court decision No 306 K/ PDT. SUS. 2010 jo commercial court decision number 01/ PAILIT.LAIN- LAIN /2009/ PN. nNIAGA.JKT. PST / Theresia Carolina

Main Author: Theresia Carolina, author
Format: Bachelors
Terbitan: [Universitas Indonesia. Fakultas Hukum;, ] , 2014
Subjects:
law
Online Access: http://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/2015-4/20388255-S55931-Theresia Carolina.pdf
ctrlnum 20388255
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?> <dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><title>Tinjauan hukum eksekusi objek jaminan fidusia pada debitur pailit studi kasus putusan Mahkamah Agung nomor 306 K/ PDT. SUS/ 2010 jo putusan pengadilan niaga jakarta pusat nomor 01/ PAILIT. LAIN -LAIN/ 2009 'PN. NIAGA.JKT.PST = Analysis on the execution of object of fiduciary guarantee on bankrupted debtor case study supreme court decision No 306 K/ PDT. SUS. 2010 jo commercial court decision number 01/ PAILIT.LAIN- LAIN /2009/ PN. nNIAGA.JKT. PST / Theresia Carolina</title><creator>Theresia Carolina, author</creator><type>Thesis:Bachelors</type><place/><publisher>[Universitas Indonesia. Fakultas Hukum;, ]</publisher><date>2014</date><description>&lt;b&gt;ABSTRAK&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt; Skripsi ini membahas mengenai eksekusi jaminan fidusia pada saat debitur pailit. Pada skripsi ini akan dibahas mengenai dua hal. Pertama, pembahasan mengenai kedudukan jaminan fidusia sebagai jaminan umum. Kedua pembahasan mengenai ketepatan Mahkamah Agung dalam mengambil keputusan yang berbeda dengan Pengadilan Niaga dalam putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 306 K/Pdt.Sus/2010 jo. Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat Nomor 01/Pailit Lain Lain/ 2009/ PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. Kasus yang digunakan dalam pembahasan ini merupakan kasus eksekusi jaminan fidusia yang dilakukan oleh kreditur pemegang jaminan fidusia yaitu PT Bank Mega Tbk., pada saat debitur , yaitu PT Tripanca Group telah dinyatakan pailit oleh Pengadilan Niaga. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, pendekatan perbandingan dan pendekatan kasus. Penelitian ini menyumpulkan bahwa jaminan fidusia bukan merupakan jaminan umum, melainkan merupakan jaminan khusus selama benda yang merupakan objek jaminan fidusia telah didaftarkan ke Kantor Pendaftaran Fidusia dan bahwa putusan Mahkamah Agung telah tepat untuk membatalkan putusan Pengadilan Niaga yang memasukkan objek jaminan fidusia ke dalam boedel pailit. &lt;hr&gt; &lt;b&gt;ABSTRACT&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt; This thesis discusses the execution of object of fiduciary guarantee on bankrupted debtor. This thesis focuses mainly on two issues. First, a discussion of the position of fiduciary guarantee as a general guarantee. Second, a discussion upon the accuracy of the Supreme Court to give a verdict contrary to the verdict given by the Commercial Court on Supreme Court Decision No. 306 K/Pdt.Sus/2010 jo. Comercial Court Decision No. 01/Pailit lain lain/2009/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. The case as used in this thesis is a case concerning the execution of an object of a fiduciary guarantee done by a creditor who received a fiduciary guarantee, which is PT Bank Mega Tbk., after a debtor, which is PT Tripanca Group, which has been declared bankrupt by the Commercial Court. This research is a normative juridical research which focuses its approach on the legislation, comparative approach and case study. This research concludes that a fiduciary guarantee is not a general guarantee, but it is a special guarantee as long as the object of the fiduciary guarantee has been listed in the Fiduciary Registration Office and that the Supreme Court decision had given the appropriate verdict on nullifying the Commercial Court Decision that included the object of the fiduciary guarantee as a bankruptcy asset</description><subject>bankruptcy.</subject><subject>law.</subject><identifier>20388255</identifier><source>http://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/2015-4/20388255-S55931-Theresia Carolina.pdf</source><recordID>20388255</recordID></dc>
format Thesis:Bachelors
Thesis
author Theresia Carolina, author
title Tinjauan hukum eksekusi objek jaminan fidusia pada debitur pailit studi kasus putusan Mahkamah Agung nomor 306 K/ PDT. SUS/ 2010 jo putusan pengadilan niaga jakarta pusat nomor 01/ PAILIT. LAIN -LAIN/ 2009 'PN. NIAGA.JKT.PST = Analysis on the execution of object of fiduciary guarantee on bankrupted debtor case study supreme court decision No 306 K/ PDT. SUS. 2010 jo commercial court decision number 01/ PAILIT.LAIN- LAIN /2009/ PN. nNIAGA.JKT. PST / Theresia Carolina
publisher [Universitas Indonesia. Fakultas Hukum;, ]
publishDate 2014
topic bankruptcy
law
url http://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/2015-4/20388255-S55931-Theresia Carolina.pdf
contents <b>ABSTRAK</b><br> Skripsi ini membahas mengenai eksekusi jaminan fidusia pada saat debitur pailit. Pada skripsi ini akan dibahas mengenai dua hal. Pertama, pembahasan mengenai kedudukan jaminan fidusia sebagai jaminan umum. Kedua pembahasan mengenai ketepatan Mahkamah Agung dalam mengambil keputusan yang berbeda dengan Pengadilan Niaga dalam putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 306 K/Pdt.Sus/2010 jo. Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Pusat Nomor 01/Pailit Lain Lain/ 2009/ PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. Kasus yang digunakan dalam pembahasan ini merupakan kasus eksekusi jaminan fidusia yang dilakukan oleh kreditur pemegang jaminan fidusia yaitu PT Bank Mega Tbk., pada saat debitur , yaitu PT Tripanca Group telah dinyatakan pailit oleh Pengadilan Niaga. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, pendekatan perbandingan dan pendekatan kasus. Penelitian ini menyumpulkan bahwa jaminan fidusia bukan merupakan jaminan umum, melainkan merupakan jaminan khusus selama benda yang merupakan objek jaminan fidusia telah didaftarkan ke Kantor Pendaftaran Fidusia dan bahwa putusan Mahkamah Agung telah tepat untuk membatalkan putusan Pengadilan Niaga yang memasukkan objek jaminan fidusia ke dalam boedel pailit. <hr> <b>ABSTRACT</b><br> This thesis discusses the execution of object of fiduciary guarantee on bankrupted debtor. This thesis focuses mainly on two issues. First, a discussion of the position of fiduciary guarantee as a general guarantee. Second, a discussion upon the accuracy of the Supreme Court to give a verdict contrary to the verdict given by the Commercial Court on Supreme Court Decision No. 306 K/Pdt.Sus/2010 jo. Comercial Court Decision No. 01/Pailit lain lain/2009/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst. The case as used in this thesis is a case concerning the execution of an object of a fiduciary guarantee done by a creditor who received a fiduciary guarantee, which is PT Bank Mega Tbk., after a debtor, which is PT Tripanca Group, which has been declared bankrupt by the Commercial Court. This research is a normative juridical research which focuses its approach on the legislation, comparative approach and case study. This research concludes that a fiduciary guarantee is not a general guarantee, but it is a special guarantee as long as the object of the fiduciary guarantee has been listed in the Fiduciary Registration Office and that the Supreme Court decision had given the appropriate verdict on nullifying the Commercial Court Decision that included the object of the fiduciary guarantee as a bankruptcy asset
id IOS18064.20388255
institution Universitas Indonesia
institution_id 51
institution_type library:university
library
library Perpustakaan Universitas Indonesia
library_id 492
collection Repository Skripsi (open) Universitas Indonesia
repository_id 18064
city KOTA DEPOK
province JAWA BARAT
repoId IOS18064
first_indexed 2022-12-13T09:06:16Z
last_indexed 2022-12-13T09:06:16Z
recordtype dc
merged_child_boolean 1
_version_ 1752193139990331392
score 17.60897