Konsesi badan usaha milik negara BUMN menurut hukum persaingan usaha di Indonesia saat ini = Concession for state owned company in perspective of competition law in Indonesia nowadays / Fabiola Rossy Septya Christina
Main Author: | Fabiola Rossy Septya Christina, author |
---|---|
Format: | Bachelors |
Terbitan: |
, 2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: |
http://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/2016-1/20412683-S59051-fabiola_rossy_septya_christina.pdf |
ctrlnum |
20412683 |
---|---|
fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><title>Konsesi badan usaha milik negara BUMN menurut hukum persaingan usaha di Indonesia saat ini = Concession for state owned company in perspective of competition law in Indonesia nowadays / Fabiola Rossy Septya Christina</title><creator>Fabiola Rossy Septya Christina, author</creator><type>Thesis:Bachelors</type><place/><publisher/><date>2015</date><description><b>ABSTRAK</b><br>
Skripsi ini merupakan analisis bentuk-bentuk pelanggaran terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat (UU No. 5 Tahun 1999) dalam kasus-kasus terkait konsesi Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN), serta perspektif tentang konsesi menurut hukum persaingan usaha di Indonesia saat ini. Analisis dilakukan dengan menguraikan pandangan-pandangan berbagai pihak dalam kasus-kasus terkait konsesi BUMN dan makna pengecualian Pasal 50 huruf a dan Pasal 51 UU No. 5 Tahun 1999. Penelitian ini bersifat yuridis normatif dengan metode pengolahan dan analisis data yang menggunakan pendekatan kualitaif. Hasil dari penelitian menemukan bahwa: bentuk-bentuk pelanggaran Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1999 meliputi oligopoli, tying agreement, monopoli, penguasaan pasar, persekongkolan, penyalahgunaan posisi dominan, dan jabatan rangkap; dan pengecualian menurut Pasal 50 huruf a dan Pasal 51 UU No. 5 Tahun 1999 hanyalah pengecualian terhadap kedudukan monopoli, bukan terhadap perbuatan dan/ atau perjanjian lain yang dilarang menurut UU No. 5 Tahun 1999.
<hr>
<b>ABSTRACT</b><br>
This Thesis is a comprehensive analysis of the kinds of violation of Law Number 5 of 1999 on Prohibitions of Monopoly Practice and Unfair Business Competition (“Law Number 5 of 1999”) in the cases related to concession for State Owned Company which have been decided by Business Competition Supervisory Commission (Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha/ KPPU); and the perspective on concession according to Competition Law in Indonesia nowadays. The Writer elaborates the perspectives on the presumptions of violation of Law Number 5 of 1999 according to the parties in the cases related to concession for State Owned Company and the meaning of exemptions in accordance with Article 50 point a and Article 51 in Law Number 5 of 1999. This research is juridical normative with qualitative method and analysis. The results show that the kinds of violation to Law Number 5 of 1999 are oligopoly, tying agreement, monopoly, market controlling, conspiracy, abuse of dominant position, and double office; and the exemptions in accordance with Article 50 a and Article 51 in Law Number 5 of 1999 apply only to the monopoly position, not to other agreements and/ or activities prohibited by Competition Law.</description><subject>Law.</subject><subject>Retail trade.</subject><identifier>20412683</identifier><source>http://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/2016-1/20412683-S59051-fabiola_rossy_septya_christina.pdf</source><recordID>20412683</recordID></dc>
|
format |
Thesis:Bachelors Thesis |
author |
Fabiola Rossy Septya Christina, author |
title |
Konsesi badan usaha milik negara BUMN menurut hukum persaingan usaha di Indonesia saat ini = Concession for state owned company in perspective of competition law in Indonesia nowadays / Fabiola Rossy Septya Christina |
publishDate |
2015 |
topic |
Law Retail trade |
url |
http://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/2016-1/20412683-S59051-fabiola_rossy_septya_christina.pdf |
contents |
<b>ABSTRAK</b><br>
Skripsi ini merupakan analisis bentuk-bentuk pelanggaran terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat (UU No. 5 Tahun 1999) dalam kasus-kasus terkait konsesi Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN), serta perspektif tentang konsesi menurut hukum persaingan usaha di Indonesia saat ini. Analisis dilakukan dengan menguraikan pandangan-pandangan berbagai pihak dalam kasus-kasus terkait konsesi BUMN dan makna pengecualian Pasal 50 huruf a dan Pasal 51 UU No. 5 Tahun 1999. Penelitian ini bersifat yuridis normatif dengan metode pengolahan dan analisis data yang menggunakan pendekatan kualitaif. Hasil dari penelitian menemukan bahwa: bentuk-bentuk pelanggaran Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1999 meliputi oligopoli, tying agreement, monopoli, penguasaan pasar, persekongkolan, penyalahgunaan posisi dominan, dan jabatan rangkap; dan pengecualian menurut Pasal 50 huruf a dan Pasal 51 UU No. 5 Tahun 1999 hanyalah pengecualian terhadap kedudukan monopoli, bukan terhadap perbuatan dan/ atau perjanjian lain yang dilarang menurut UU No. 5 Tahun 1999.
<hr>
<b>ABSTRACT</b><br>
This Thesis is a comprehensive analysis of the kinds of violation of Law Number 5 of 1999 on Prohibitions of Monopoly Practice and Unfair Business Competition (“Law Number 5 of 1999”) in the cases related to concession for State Owned Company which have been decided by Business Competition Supervisory Commission (Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha/ KPPU); and the perspective on concession according to Competition Law in Indonesia nowadays. The Writer elaborates the perspectives on the presumptions of violation of Law Number 5 of 1999 according to the parties in the cases related to concession for State Owned Company and the meaning of exemptions in accordance with Article 50 point a and Article 51 in Law Number 5 of 1999. This research is juridical normative with qualitative method and analysis. The results show that the kinds of violation to Law Number 5 of 1999 are oligopoly, tying agreement, monopoly, market controlling, conspiracy, abuse of dominant position, and double office; and the exemptions in accordance with Article 50 a and Article 51 in Law Number 5 of 1999 apply only to the monopoly position, not to other agreements and/ or activities prohibited by Competition Law. |
id |
IOS18064.20412683 |
institution |
Universitas Indonesia |
institution_id |
51 |
institution_type |
library:university library |
library |
Perpustakaan Universitas Indonesia |
library_id |
492 |
collection |
Repository Skripsi (open) Universitas Indonesia |
repository_id |
18064 |
city |
KOTA DEPOK |
province |
JAWA BARAT |
repoId |
IOS18064 |
first_indexed |
2022-12-13T08:54:26Z |
last_indexed |
2022-12-13T08:54:26Z |
recordtype |
dc |
merged_child_boolean |
1 |
_version_ |
1752184870103154688 |
score |
17.203505 |