Konsekuensi yuridis terhadap akta jual beli tanah yang dibuat tidak sesuai dengan kehendak para pihak dan peraturan perundang undangan yang berlaku tinjauan yuridis atas putusan majelis pengawas pusat notaris nomor 08 b mj ppn xii 2014 = Judicial qonsequences on land sale and purchase deed that was made not in accordance to legislation and consent of the parties involved judicial review on majelis pengawas pusat notaris decision number 08 b mj ppn xii 2014 / Nina Lumongga Hakim
| Main Author: | Nina Lumongga Hakim, author |
|---|---|
| Format: | Masters Thesis |
| Terbitan: |
, 2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/2016-5/20423202-T44892-Nina Lumongga Hakim.pdf |
| ctrlnum |
20423202 |
|---|---|
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><title>Konsekuensi yuridis terhadap akta jual beli tanah yang dibuat tidak sesuai dengan kehendak para pihak dan peraturan perundang undangan yang berlaku tinjauan yuridis atas putusan majelis pengawas pusat notaris nomor 08 b mj ppn xii 2014 = Judicial qonsequences on land sale and purchase deed that was made not in accordance to legislation and consent of the parties involved judicial review on majelis pengawas pusat notaris decision number 08 b mj ppn xii 2014 / Nina Lumongga Hakim</title><creator>Nina Lumongga Hakim, author</creator><type>Thesis:Masters</type><place/><publisher/><date>2016</date><description>[<b>ABSTRAK</b><br>
Seiring dengan tumbuhnya kesadaran masyarakat akan pentingnya alat bukti tertulis dalam lalu lintas kehidupan sehari-hari, baik yang berhubungan dengan kehidupan pribadi maupun yang berhubungan dengan pekerjaan mereka maka akta otentik sebagai alat bukti tertulis yang terkuat dan terpenuh sangat dibutuhkan. PPAT sebagai salah satu Pejabat Umum yang memiliki kewenangan untuk membuat akta otentik mengenai hak atas tanah dan Hak Milik atas Satuan Rumah Susun dituntut kecermatan dan ketelitiannya dalam pembuatan akta otentik yang berhubungan dengan tugas jabatannya. Selain itu PPAT juga dituntut untuk bersikap jujur, independen dan tidak memihak pada salah satu kliennya. PPAT juga wajib memberikan penyuluhan hukum terkait masalah pertanahan yang dihadapi kliennya dan menolak untuk membuat akta apabila tidak disertai dengan data formil. Akta PPAT yang dibuat dengan mengabaikan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku akan memiliki konsekuensi yuridis terhadap aktanya. Dalam penelitian ini metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan tipe penelitian yaitu penelitian preskriptif dan dianalisa secara kualitatif dan dilaporkan dalam bentuk preskriptif analitis. Dari hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa PPAT wajib membuat akta sesuai bentuk dan tata cara yang telah diatur di dalam Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 37 Tahun 1998 juncto Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997. Kelalaian PPAT dalam melaksanakan pembuatan akta sesuai peraturan yang berlaku dapat berakibat aktanya memiliki cacat yuridis dan kehilangan otentisitasnya. Pihak-pihak yang dirugikan oleh perbuatan PPAT dapat menuntut ganti kerugian.
<hr>
<b>ABSTRACT</b><br>
The importance of written evidence on daily lives of society has long been recognized. Authentic deed as a written evidence is very much needed both in private and public activities and in business transactions because authentic deed has the strongest and fullest proof that things that said in the deed are true. PPAT as one of the officers which has been appointed to make authentic deed has to work with accuracy and carefulness in making the deed. Besides that, PPAT also is demanded to work independently and impartial. In doing his job, PPAT has to give the best advice to his/her clients over their problems about making the best decision towards their land problems. PPAT deeds that was made not in accordance to legislation will have judicial qonsequences on the deeds and PPAT could be charged based on Torts by people that has been injured. This research uses judicial normative method of research with prescriptive type of research and outcome in prescriptive analysis research. From the research that has been done, it can be summarized that the importance of the authenticity of the deed is that it is made in accordance to Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 37 Tahun 1998 juncto Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997. Negligence in making the deed in accordance to the law would make the deed loose its authenticity and PPAT could be sued for damages by parties injured., The importance of written evidence on daily lives of society has long been recognized. Authentic deed as a written evidence is very much needed both in private and public activities and in business transactions because authentic deed has the strongest and fullest proof that things that said in the deed are true. PPAT as one of the officers which has been appointed to make authentic deed has to work with accuracy and carefulness in making the deed. Besides that, PPAT also is demanded to work independently and impartial. In doing his job, PPAT has to give the best advice to his/her clients over their problems about making the best decision towards their land problems. PPAT deeds that was made not in accordance to legislation will have judicial qonsequences on the deeds and PPAT could be charged based on Torts by people that has been injured. This research uses judicial normative method of research with prescriptive type of research and outcome in prescriptive analysis research. From the research that has been done, it can be summarized that the importance of the authenticity of the deed is that it is made in accordance to Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 37 Tahun 1998 juncto Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997. Negligence in making the deed in accordance to the law would make the deed loose its authenticity and PPAT could be sued for damages by parties injured.
]</description><subject>Authentic Deed</subject><subject>Land Deed Officer</subject><subject>Judicial Consequences</subject><identifier>20423202</identifier><source>http://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/2016-5/20423202-T44892-Nina Lumongga Hakim.pdf</source><recordID>20423202</recordID></dc>
|
| format |
Thesis:Masters Thesis Thesis:Thesis |
| author |
Nina Lumongga Hakim, author |
| title |
Konsekuensi yuridis terhadap akta jual beli tanah yang dibuat tidak sesuai dengan kehendak para pihak dan peraturan perundang undangan yang berlaku tinjauan yuridis atas putusan majelis pengawas pusat notaris nomor 08 b mj ppn xii 2014 = Judicial qonsequences on land sale and purchase deed that was made not in accordance to legislation and consent of the parties involved judicial review on majelis pengawas pusat notaris decision number 08 b mj ppn xii 2014 / Nina Lumongga Hakim |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| topic |
Authentic Deed Land Deed Officer Judicial Consequences |
| url |
http://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/2016-5/20423202-T44892-Nina Lumongga Hakim.pdf |
| contents |
[<b>ABSTRAK</b><br>
Seiring dengan tumbuhnya kesadaran masyarakat akan pentingnya alat bukti tertulis dalam lalu lintas kehidupan sehari-hari, baik yang berhubungan dengan kehidupan pribadi maupun yang berhubungan dengan pekerjaan mereka maka akta otentik sebagai alat bukti tertulis yang terkuat dan terpenuh sangat dibutuhkan. PPAT sebagai salah satu Pejabat Umum yang memiliki kewenangan untuk membuat akta otentik mengenai hak atas tanah dan Hak Milik atas Satuan Rumah Susun dituntut kecermatan dan ketelitiannya dalam pembuatan akta otentik yang berhubungan dengan tugas jabatannya. Selain itu PPAT juga dituntut untuk bersikap jujur, independen dan tidak memihak pada salah satu kliennya. PPAT juga wajib memberikan penyuluhan hukum terkait masalah pertanahan yang dihadapi kliennya dan menolak untuk membuat akta apabila tidak disertai dengan data formil. Akta PPAT yang dibuat dengan mengabaikan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku akan memiliki konsekuensi yuridis terhadap aktanya. Dalam penelitian ini metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan tipe penelitian yaitu penelitian preskriptif dan dianalisa secara kualitatif dan dilaporkan dalam bentuk preskriptif analitis. Dari hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa PPAT wajib membuat akta sesuai bentuk dan tata cara yang telah diatur di dalam Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 37 Tahun 1998 juncto Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997. Kelalaian PPAT dalam melaksanakan pembuatan akta sesuai peraturan yang berlaku dapat berakibat aktanya memiliki cacat yuridis dan kehilangan otentisitasnya. Pihak-pihak yang dirugikan oleh perbuatan PPAT dapat menuntut ganti kerugian.
<hr>
<b>ABSTRACT</b><br>
The importance of written evidence on daily lives of society has long been recognized. Authentic deed as a written evidence is very much needed both in private and public activities and in business transactions because authentic deed has the strongest and fullest proof that things that said in the deed are true. PPAT as one of the officers which has been appointed to make authentic deed has to work with accuracy and carefulness in making the deed. Besides that, PPAT also is demanded to work independently and impartial. In doing his job, PPAT has to give the best advice to his/her clients over their problems about making the best decision towards their land problems. PPAT deeds that was made not in accordance to legislation will have judicial qonsequences on the deeds and PPAT could be charged based on Torts by people that has been injured. This research uses judicial normative method of research with prescriptive type of research and outcome in prescriptive analysis research. From the research that has been done, it can be summarized that the importance of the authenticity of the deed is that it is made in accordance to Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 37 Tahun 1998 juncto Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997. Negligence in making the deed in accordance to the law would make the deed loose its authenticity and PPAT could be sued for damages by parties injured., The importance of written evidence on daily lives of society has long been recognized. Authentic deed as a written evidence is very much needed both in private and public activities and in business transactions because authentic deed has the strongest and fullest proof that things that said in the deed are true. PPAT as one of the officers which has been appointed to make authentic deed has to work with accuracy and carefulness in making the deed. Besides that, PPAT also is demanded to work independently and impartial. In doing his job, PPAT has to give the best advice to his/her clients over their problems about making the best decision towards their land problems. PPAT deeds that was made not in accordance to legislation will have judicial qonsequences on the deeds and PPAT could be charged based on Torts by people that has been injured. This research uses judicial normative method of research with prescriptive type of research and outcome in prescriptive analysis research. From the research that has been done, it can be summarized that the importance of the authenticity of the deed is that it is made in accordance to Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 37 Tahun 1998 juncto Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997. Negligence in making the deed in accordance to the law would make the deed loose its authenticity and PPAT could be sued for damages by parties injured.
] |
| id |
IOS18066.20423202 |
| institution |
Universitas Indonesia |
| institution_id |
51 |
| institution_type |
library:university library |
| library |
Perpustakaan Universitas Indonesia |
| library_id |
492 |
| collection |
contoh Repository Tesis (Open) Universitas Indonesia |
| repository_id |
18066 |
| city |
KOTA DEPOK |
| province |
JAWA BARAT |
| repoId |
IOS18066 |
| first_indexed |
2022-12-14T02:42:24Z |
| last_indexed |
2022-12-14T02:42:24Z |
| recordtype |
dc |
| merged_child_boolean |
1 |
| _version_ |
1752205631258886144 |
| score |
17.609869 |