Perdebatan konsep intervensi kemanusiaan dan keterkaitannya dengan great debate dalam hubungan internasional = Humanitarian intervention concept and great debate in international relations

Main Authors: Caroline Widagdo, author, Add author: Edy Prasetyono, supervisor, Add author: Suzie Sri Suparin S. Sudarman, examiner, Add author: Nurul Isnaeni, examiner
Format: Bachelors Doctoral
Terbitan: Univesitas Indonesia. Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Dan Politik , 2014
Subjects:
Online Access: https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20392944
ctrlnum 20392944
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?> <dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><type>Thesis:Bachelors</type><title>Perdebatan konsep intervensi kemanusiaan dan keterkaitannya dengan great debate dalam hubungan internasional = Humanitarian intervention concept and great debate in international relations</title><creator>Caroline Widagdo, author</creator><creator>Add author: Edy Prasetyono, supervisor</creator><creator>Add author: Suzie Sri Suparin S. Sudarman, examiner</creator><creator>Add author: Nurul Isnaeni, examiner</creator><publisher>Univesitas Indonesia. Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Dan Politik</publisher><date>2014</date><subject>Foreign relations</subject><subject>Human rights.</subject><description>[Konsep intervensi kemanusiaan merujuk kembali kepada great debate dalam hubungan internasional antara idealisme dan realisme. Intervensi kemanusiaan menjadi sebuah konsep yang ditawarkan oleh perspektif idealisme sebagai sebuah tanggung jawab komunitas internasional untuk membantu pemenuhan hak hidup setiap individu di negara yang tidak mampu menjalankan fungsi perlindungan terhadap warga negaranya. Pelaksanaan intervensi yang melewati batasan jurisdiksi dan otoritas pemerintah negara berdaulat bertentangan dengan prinsip dasar kedaulatan dalam hubungan internasional. Pengaruh Great Powers dalam pelaksanaan intervensi kemanusiaan juga menimbulkan kritik dari realisme yang melihatnya sebagai sebuah politik kekuatan. Hal tersebut menarik perhatian penulis untuk mengkaji lebih lanjut mengenai perdebatan-perdebatan yang muncul dalam pembahasan mengenai intervensi kemanusiaan. Tulisan ini akan memberikan pembahasan mengenai perdebatan intervensi kemanusiaan dalam keterkaitannya dengan great debate dalam hubungan internasional, serta beberapa alternatif pemikiran ideal terkait perdebatan tersebut.;The concept of humanitarian intervention referred back to the great debate in international relations between idealisme and realism. Idealism explained humanitarian intervention as a mechanism of responsibility of the international community to help every individual to meet their basic rights. International community have the obligation to help a nation which the government could not fulfilled their responsibility to protect the citizen. Despite its moral background, the practice of humanitarian intervention is breaking the rules of sovereignty and non-intervention in international relations. Critics from realism focus on the violation of sovereignty and domination of Great Powers in the implementation of the concept. The paper explored the concept of humanitarian intervention in its relations with great debate between idealism and realism in IR, along with some alternative perspectives around the debates.;The concept of humanitarian intervention referred back to the great debate in international relations between idealisme and realism. Idealism explained humanitarian intervention as a mechanism of responsibility of the international community to help every individual to meet their basic rights. International community have the obligation to help a nation which the government could not fulfilled their responsibility to protect the citizen. Despite its moral background, the practice of humanitarian intervention is breaking the rules of sovereignty and non-intervention in international relations. Critics from realism focus on the violation of sovereignty and domination of Great Powers in the implementation of the concept. The paper explored the concept of humanitarian intervention in its relations with great debate between idealism and realism in IR, along with some alternative perspectives around the debates., The concept of humanitarian intervention referred back to the great debate in international relations between idealisme and realism. Idealism explained humanitarian intervention as a mechanism of responsibility of the international community to help every individual to meet their basic rights. International community have the obligation to help a nation which the government could not fulfilled their responsibility to protect the citizen. Despite its moral background, the practice of humanitarian intervention is breaking the rules of sovereignty and non-intervention in international relations. Critics from realism focus on the violation of sovereignty and domination of Great Powers in the implementation of the concept. The paper explored the concept of humanitarian intervention in its relations with great debate between idealism and realism in IR, along with some alternative perspectives around the debates.]</description><identifier>https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20392944</identifier><recordID>20392944</recordID></dc>
format Thesis:Bachelors
Thesis
Thesis:Doctoral
author Caroline Widagdo, author
Add author: Edy Prasetyono, supervisor
Add author: Suzie Sri Suparin S. Sudarman, examiner
Add author: Nurul Isnaeni, examiner
title Perdebatan konsep intervensi kemanusiaan dan keterkaitannya dengan great debate dalam hubungan internasional = Humanitarian intervention concept and great debate in international relations
publisher Univesitas Indonesia. Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Dan Politik
publishDate 2014
topic Foreign relations
Human rights
url https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20392944
contents [Konsep intervensi kemanusiaan merujuk kembali kepada great debate dalam hubungan internasional antara idealisme dan realisme. Intervensi kemanusiaan menjadi sebuah konsep yang ditawarkan oleh perspektif idealisme sebagai sebuah tanggung jawab komunitas internasional untuk membantu pemenuhan hak hidup setiap individu di negara yang tidak mampu menjalankan fungsi perlindungan terhadap warga negaranya. Pelaksanaan intervensi yang melewati batasan jurisdiksi dan otoritas pemerintah negara berdaulat bertentangan dengan prinsip dasar kedaulatan dalam hubungan internasional. Pengaruh Great Powers dalam pelaksanaan intervensi kemanusiaan juga menimbulkan kritik dari realisme yang melihatnya sebagai sebuah politik kekuatan. Hal tersebut menarik perhatian penulis untuk mengkaji lebih lanjut mengenai perdebatan-perdebatan yang muncul dalam pembahasan mengenai intervensi kemanusiaan. Tulisan ini akan memberikan pembahasan mengenai perdebatan intervensi kemanusiaan dalam keterkaitannya dengan great debate dalam hubungan internasional, serta beberapa alternatif pemikiran ideal terkait perdebatan tersebut.;The concept of humanitarian intervention referred back to the great debate in international relations between idealisme and realism. Idealism explained humanitarian intervention as a mechanism of responsibility of the international community to help every individual to meet their basic rights. International community have the obligation to help a nation which the government could not fulfilled their responsibility to protect the citizen. Despite its moral background, the practice of humanitarian intervention is breaking the rules of sovereignty and non-intervention in international relations. Critics from realism focus on the violation of sovereignty and domination of Great Powers in the implementation of the concept. The paper explored the concept of humanitarian intervention in its relations with great debate between idealism and realism in IR, along with some alternative perspectives around the debates.;The concept of humanitarian intervention referred back to the great debate in international relations between idealisme and realism. Idealism explained humanitarian intervention as a mechanism of responsibility of the international community to help every individual to meet their basic rights. International community have the obligation to help a nation which the government could not fulfilled their responsibility to protect the citizen. Despite its moral background, the practice of humanitarian intervention is breaking the rules of sovereignty and non-intervention in international relations. Critics from realism focus on the violation of sovereignty and domination of Great Powers in the implementation of the concept. The paper explored the concept of humanitarian intervention in its relations with great debate between idealism and realism in IR, along with some alternative perspectives around the debates., The concept of humanitarian intervention referred back to the great debate in international relations between idealisme and realism. Idealism explained humanitarian intervention as a mechanism of responsibility of the international community to help every individual to meet their basic rights. International community have the obligation to help a nation which the government could not fulfilled their responsibility to protect the citizen. Despite its moral background, the practice of humanitarian intervention is breaking the rules of sovereignty and non-intervention in international relations. Critics from realism focus on the violation of sovereignty and domination of Great Powers in the implementation of the concept. The paper explored the concept of humanitarian intervention in its relations with great debate between idealism and realism in IR, along with some alternative perspectives around the debates.]
id IOS18069.20392944
institution Universitas Indonesia
institution_id 51
institution_type library:university
library
library Perpustakaan Universitas Indonesia
library_id 492
collection Repository Disertasi (Open) Universitas Indonesia
repository_id 18069
city KOTA DEPOK
province JAWA BARAT
repoId IOS18069
first_indexed 2022-12-14T04:39:15Z
last_indexed 2022-12-14T04:39:15Z
recordtype dc
merged_child_boolean 1
_version_ 1752210168309874688
score 17.610468