Identity and Loyalty in the David Story: A Postcolonial Reading

Main Author: Uriah Y. Kim
Format: Book 220.9 KIM i - 1
Terbitan: Sheffield Phoenix Press Limited , 2008
Subjects:
Online Access: http://perpustakaan.alkitab.or.id//index.php?p=show_detail&id=6187
http://perpustakaan.alkitab.or.id//lib/minigalnano/createthumb.php?filename=images/docs/978-1-906055-58-5.jpeg&width=200
ctrlnum slims-6187
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?> <dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><title>Identity and Loyalty in the David Story: A Postcolonial Reading</title><creator>Uriah Y. Kim</creator><subject>Umum</subject><publisher>Sheffield Phoenix Press Limited</publisher><date>2008</date><language>0</language><type>Book:Book</type><identifier>http://perpustakaan.alkitab.or.id//index.php?p=show_detail&amp;id=6187</identifier><identifier>9781906055585</identifier><identifier>13</identifier><description>In this volume, Uriah Kim examines King David in a new light - the politics of identity and loyalty. He reads the David story from the North American context, in which millions of Americans are compelled to make a choice between their multiple heritages, which are inseparably encoded in their genetic or cultural makeup. In making this choice, their loyalty to their nation and to their particular racial/ethnic community is questioned if they do not define themselves with a single identity. Kim sees a David who was radically inclusive: an egalitarian who was open to making connections with people across various boundaries and differences and who was thus able to build a multi-ethnic kingdom. Rather than basing his rule on his own tribal identity, David built his kingdom by attracting the loyalty of diverse constituents and by putting together an eclectic coalition of ethnic, tribal, and religious groups based on loyalty. It was only later, as part of the identity formation of ancient Israel, that people who were equally part of David's hybridized kingdom were separated into 'real' Israelites as opposed to 'the other' in the narrative. In this reading, Kim leads the reader to a new understanding of David: he did not just use Realpolitik and the sword, nor did he depend totally on God's providence to establish his kingdom; rather, he practised the transgressive power of hesed ('loyalty and kindness') to forge his kingdom.</description><coverage>USA</coverage><identifier>http://perpustakaan.alkitab.or.id//lib/minigalnano/createthumb.php?filename=images/docs/978-1-906055-58-5.jpeg&amp;width=200</identifier><type>Other:220.9 KIM i - 1</type><subject>220.9 KIM i</subject><recordID>slims-6187</recordID></dc>
format Book:Book
Book
Other:220.9 KIM i - 1
Other
author Uriah Y. Kim
title Identity and Loyalty in the David Story: A Postcolonial Reading
publisher Sheffield Phoenix Press Limited
publishDate 2008
isbn 9781906055585
topic Umum
220.9 KIM i
url http://perpustakaan.alkitab.or.id//index.php?p=show_detail&id=6187
http://perpustakaan.alkitab.or.id//lib/minigalnano/createthumb.php?filename=images/docs/978-1-906055-58-5.jpeg&width=200
contents In this volume, Uriah Kim examines King David in a new light - the politics of identity and loyalty. He reads the David story from the North American context, in which millions of Americans are compelled to make a choice between their multiple heritages, which are inseparably encoded in their genetic or cultural makeup. In making this choice, their loyalty to their nation and to their particular racial/ethnic community is questioned if they do not define themselves with a single identity. Kim sees a David who was radically inclusive: an egalitarian who was open to making connections with people across various boundaries and differences and who was thus able to build a multi-ethnic kingdom. Rather than basing his rule on his own tribal identity, David built his kingdom by attracting the loyalty of diverse constituents and by putting together an eclectic coalition of ethnic, tribal, and religious groups based on loyalty. It was only later, as part of the identity formation of ancient Israel, that people who were equally part of David's hybridized kingdom were separated into 'real' Israelites as opposed to 'the other' in the narrative. In this reading, Kim leads the reader to a new understanding of David: he did not just use Realpolitik and the sword, nor did he depend totally on God's providence to establish his kingdom; rather, he practised the transgressive power of hesed ('loyalty and kindness') to forge his kingdom.
id IOS19658.slims-6187
institution DEFAULT
institution_type library:public
library
library DEFAULT
collection DEFAULT
city DEFAULT
province DEFAULT
repoId IOS19658
first_indexed 2024-06-13T04:51:14Z
last_indexed 2024-06-13T04:51:14Z
recordtype dc
_version_ 1801746177720320000
score 9.9049015