ChatGPT and Medical Education: A Double-Edged Sword

Main Authors: Khairatun Hisan, Urfa, Miftahul Amri, Muhammad
Format: Article info application/pdf Journal
Bahasa: eng
Terbitan: The Indonesian Institute of Science and Technology Research , 2023
Subjects:
Online Access: https://journal.iistr.org/index.php/JPES/article/view/302
https://journal.iistr.org/index.php/JPES/article/view/302/212
ctrlnum article-302
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?> <dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><title lang="en-US">ChatGPT and Medical Education: A Double-Edged Sword</title><creator>Khairatun Hisan, Urfa</creator><creator>Miftahul Amri, Muhammad</creator><subject lang="en-US">ChatGPT</subject><subject lang="en-US">medical education</subject><subject lang="en-US">exam</subject><subject lang="en-US">research</subject><subject lang="en-US">abstract</subject><description lang="en-US">ChatGPT has gained attention worldwide. In the medical education field, ChatGPT, or any similar large language model, provides a convenient way for students to access information and practice their skills. ChatGPT can simulate patient interactions, allowing students to practice their diagnostic and communication skills in a safe and controlled environment. ChatGPT can also answer questions and provide explanations for complex medical concepts. There have been attempts involving ChatGPT to assist researchers in writing journal articles. Due to its capabilities, ChatGPT has the potential to be abused and sparking ethical concerns. Unwise researchers can now employ ChatGPT to write academic articles. Similarly, irresponsible students, might utilize ChatGPT to cheat during exams. We investigated whether ChatGPT, in its current state, can answer Indonesian medical doctor examination problems. Among the 3 problems that we have picked, ChatGPT can only correctly answer 1 question. We also examine whether ChatGPT-generated abstracts can fool professionals and educators. We have brought 6 abstracts, 3 of which are taken from actual published papers, while the other 3 were generated by ChatGPT. We recruited 12 participants with either a medical doctor (M.D.), a doctorate (Ph.D.), or an M.D., Ph.D. degree from various institutions in Indonesia. Surprisingly, 4 of the participants couldn't guess a single abstract correctly, 6 could only identify 1 abstract accurately, one correctly guessed 2 abstracts, and one correctly identified 3 abstracts. Therefore, it is safe to say that ChatGPT, in its current state, has been able to fool professionals and educators.</description><publisher lang="en-US">The Indonesian Institute of Science and Technology Research</publisher><date>2023-03-11</date><type>Journal:Article</type><type>Other:info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</type><type>Journal:Article</type><type>File:application/pdf</type><identifier>https://journal.iistr.org/index.php/JPES/article/view/302</identifier><identifier>10.56741/jpes.v2i01.302</identifier><source lang="en-US">Journal of Pedagogy and Education Science; Vol. 2 No. 01 (2023): Journal of Pedagogy and Education Science; 71-89</source><source lang="id-ID">Journal of Pedagogy and Education Science; Vol 2 No 01 (2023): Journal of Pedagogy and Education Science; 71-89</source><source>2962-1763</source><source>2962-5777</source><source>10.56741/jpes.v2i01</source><language>eng</language><relation>https://journal.iistr.org/index.php/JPES/article/view/302/212</relation><rights lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2023 Urfa Khairatun Hisan, Muhammad Miftahul Amri</rights><rights lang="en-US">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</rights><recordID>article-302</recordID></dc>
language eng
format Journal:Article
Journal
Other:info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Other
File:application/pdf
File
Journal:Journal
author Khairatun Hisan, Urfa
Miftahul Amri, Muhammad
title ChatGPT and Medical Education: A Double-Edged Sword
publisher The Indonesian Institute of Science and Technology Research
publishDate 2023
topic ChatGPT
medical education
exam
research
abstract
url https://journal.iistr.org/index.php/JPES/article/view/302
https://journal.iistr.org/index.php/JPES/article/view/302/212
contents ChatGPT has gained attention worldwide. In the medical education field, ChatGPT, or any similar large language model, provides a convenient way for students to access information and practice their skills. ChatGPT can simulate patient interactions, allowing students to practice their diagnostic and communication skills in a safe and controlled environment. ChatGPT can also answer questions and provide explanations for complex medical concepts. There have been attempts involving ChatGPT to assist researchers in writing journal articles. Due to its capabilities, ChatGPT has the potential to be abused and sparking ethical concerns. Unwise researchers can now employ ChatGPT to write academic articles. Similarly, irresponsible students, might utilize ChatGPT to cheat during exams. We investigated whether ChatGPT, in its current state, can answer Indonesian medical doctor examination problems. Among the 3 problems that we have picked, ChatGPT can only correctly answer 1 question. We also examine whether ChatGPT-generated abstracts can fool professionals and educators. We have brought 6 abstracts, 3 of which are taken from actual published papers, while the other 3 were generated by ChatGPT. We recruited 12 participants with either a medical doctor (M.D.), a doctorate (Ph.D.), or an M.D., Ph.D. degree from various institutions in Indonesia. Surprisingly, 4 of the participants couldn't guess a single abstract correctly, 6 could only identify 1 abstract accurately, one correctly guessed 2 abstracts, and one correctly identified 3 abstracts. Therefore, it is safe to say that ChatGPT, in its current state, has been able to fool professionals and educators.
id IOS20040.article-302
institution Indonesian Institute of Science and Technology Research
institution_id 10707
institution_type library:public
library
library Indonesian Institute of Science and Technology Research (IISTR)
library_id 7954
collection Journal of Pedagogy and Education Science
repository_id 20040
subject_area Education
Pedagogy
School
Learning Theory
city KOTA YOGYAKARTA
province DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA
repoId IOS20040
first_indexed 2024-06-11T03:04:48Z
last_indexed 2024-06-11T03:04:48Z
recordtype dc
_version_ 1801532868627791872
score 9.9049015