| Main Authors: | Sudiar, Nining, Mafar, Fiqru, H., Rosman |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article info application/pdf eJournal |
| Bahasa: | ind |
| Terbitan: |
Pusat Kajian Humaniora FBS Universitas Negeri Padang
, 2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/humanus/article/view/6414 http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/humanus/article/view/6414/4968 |
| ctrlnum |
article-6414 |
|---|---|
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><title lang="en-US"/><title lang="id-ID">EVALUASI PENULISAN ABSTRAK HASIL PENELITIAN DOSEN UNIVERSITAS LANCANG KUNING</title><creator>Sudiar, Nining</creator><creator>Mafar, Fiqru</creator><creator>H., Rosman</creator><subject lang="en-US"/><subject lang="en-US"/><subject lang="id-ID"/><subject lang="id-ID">Abstrak, Hasil Penelitian, Dosen, Unilak.</subject><description lang="en-US"/><description lang="id-ID">THE EVALUATION OF ABSTRACT FOR RESEARCH REPORTS WRITTEN BY LECTURERS OF LANCANG KUNING UNIVERSITYAbstract is an important part in the writing of research reports. However, not all authors to understand the elements of abstract writing research reports. This study aimed to evaluate the writing of abstract research professor at the University Lancang Kuning. The method used in this research is quantitative method to see the abstract research faculty produced between the years 2014-2015. The assessment is done by assessing the consistency of the faculty in writing to follow the provisions of abstract research based Handbook of Research and Community Services Lancang Kuning University Edition III. Results of the study will be used as the evaluation results at the same time improving the quality of faculty research Unilak. The results showed that there is still a lot abstract research reports Unilak lecturers who do not meet predetermined criteria abstract. Incompatibility is the most relevant number of words. A total of 59.38% abstracts of research reports lecturer exceed 200 words. This means there are many research reports abstract lecturer who still do not meet the criteria of the abstract that has been determined.Keywords:  abstract, research report, lecture, UnilakAbstrakAbstrak merupakan bagian penting dalam penulisan laporan penelitian. Namun, belum semua penulis memahami unsur-unsur penulisan abstrak laporan penelitian. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi penulisan abstrak hasil penelitian dosen Universitas Lancang Kuning. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode kuantitatif dengan melihat abstrak hasil penelitian dosen yang dihasilkan antara tahun 2014-2015. Pengkajian dilakukan dengan menilai konsistensi dosen dalam mengikuti ketentuan penulisan abstrak hasil penelitian berdasarkan Buku Panduan Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Universitas Lancang Kuning Edisi III. Hasil penelitian nantinya dapat dijadikan sebagai evaluasi sekaligus peningkatan mutu hasil penelitian dosen Unilak. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa masih banyak abstrak laporan hasil penelitian dosen Unilak yang belum memenuhi kriteria abstrak yang telah ditentukan. Ketidaksesuaian terbanyak adalah terkait jumlah kata. Sebanyak 59,38% abstrak laporan hasil penelitian dosen melebihi 200 kata. Hal ini berarti masih banyak abstrak laporan hasil penelitian dosen yang masih belum memenuhi kriteria abstrak yang telah ditentukan.  Kata Kunci: Abstrak, Hasil Penelitian, Dosen, Unilak.</description><publisher lang="en-US">Pusat Kajian Humaniora FBS Universitas Negeri Padang</publisher><contributor lang="en-US"/><contributor lang="id-ID"/><date>2016-03-10</date><type>Journal:Article</type><type>Other:info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</type><type>Journal:Article</type><type>Other:</type><type>Other:</type><type>File:application/pdf</type><identifier>http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/humanus/article/view/6414</identifier><identifier>10.24036/jh.v15i1.6414</identifier><source lang="en-US">Humanus; Vol 15, No 1 (2016); 72-82</source><source lang="id-ID">HUMANUS; Vol 15, No 1 (2016); 72-82</source><source>2528-3936</source><source>1410-8062</source><source>10.24036/humanus.v15i1</source><language>ind</language><relation>http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/humanus/article/view/6414/4968</relation><coverage lang="en-US"/><coverage lang="en-US"/><coverage lang="en-US"/><coverage lang="id-ID">Asia</coverage><coverage lang="id-ID"/><coverage lang="id-ID"/><rights lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2016 Humanus</rights><recordID>article-6414</recordID></dc>
|
| language |
ind |
| format |
Journal:Article Journal Other:info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Other Other: File:application/pdf File Journal:eJournal |
| author |
Sudiar, Nining Mafar, Fiqru H., Rosman |
| publisher |
Pusat Kajian Humaniora FBS Universitas Negeri Padang |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| topic |
Abstrak Hasil Penelitian Dosen Unilak |
| url |
http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/humanus/article/view/6414 http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/humanus/article/view/6414/4968 |
| contents |
THE EVALUATION OF ABSTRACT FOR RESEARCH REPORTS WRITTEN BY LECTURERS OF LANCANG KUNING UNIVERSITYAbstract is an important part in the writing of research reports. However, not all authors to understand the elements of abstract writing research reports. This study aimed to evaluate the writing of abstract research professor at the University Lancang Kuning. The method used in this research is quantitative method to see the abstract research faculty produced between the years 2014-2015. The assessment is done by assessing the consistency of the faculty in writing to follow the provisions of abstract research based Handbook of Research and Community Services Lancang Kuning University Edition III. Results of the study will be used as the evaluation results at the same time improving the quality of faculty research Unilak. The results showed that there is still a lot abstract research reports Unilak lecturers who do not meet predetermined criteria abstract. Incompatibility is the most relevant number of words. A total of 59.38% abstracts of research reports lecturer exceed 200 words. This means there are many research reports abstract lecturer who still do not meet the criteria of the abstract that has been determined.Keywords: abstract, research report, lecture, UnilakAbstrakAbstrak merupakan bagian penting dalam penulisan laporan penelitian. Namun, belum semua penulis memahami unsur-unsur penulisan abstrak laporan penelitian. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi penulisan abstrak hasil penelitian dosen Universitas Lancang Kuning. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode kuantitatif dengan melihat abstrak hasil penelitian dosen yang dihasilkan antara tahun 2014-2015. Pengkajian dilakukan dengan menilai konsistensi dosen dalam mengikuti ketentuan penulisan abstrak hasil penelitian berdasarkan Buku Panduan Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Universitas Lancang Kuning Edisi III. Hasil penelitian nantinya dapat dijadikan sebagai evaluasi sekaligus peningkatan mutu hasil penelitian dosen Unilak. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa masih banyak abstrak laporan hasil penelitian dosen Unilak yang belum memenuhi kriteria abstrak yang telah ditentukan. Ketidaksesuaian terbanyak adalah terkait jumlah kata. Sebanyak 59,38% abstrak laporan hasil penelitian dosen melebihi 200 kata. Hal ini berarti masih banyak abstrak laporan hasil penelitian dosen yang masih belum memenuhi kriteria abstrak yang telah ditentukan. Kata Kunci: Abstrak, Hasil Penelitian, Dosen, Unilak. |
| id |
IOS3565.article-6414 |
| institution |
Universitas Negeri Padang |
| institution_id |
56 |
| institution_type |
library:university library |
| library |
Perpustakaan Universitas Negeri Padang |
| library_id |
565 |
| collection |
Humanus |
| repository_id |
3565 |
| subject_area |
Bahasa Kesusastraan Sosial dan Budaya |
| city |
KOTA PADANG |
| province |
SUMATERA BARAT |
| repoId |
IOS3565 |
| first_indexed |
2017-02-26T00:16:53Z |
| last_indexed |
2018-04-01T02:38:38Z |
| recordtype |
dc |
| _version_ |
1685971326850826240 |
| score |
17.60778 |