Third Party’s Asset Confiscation in Corruption Crime
| Main Author: | Supardi, Supardi |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article info application/pdf Journal |
| Bahasa: | eng |
| Terbitan: |
Universitas Airlangga
, 2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/article/view/8427 http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/article/view/8427/pdf_1 |
| ctrlnum |
article-8427 |
|---|---|
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><title lang="en-US">Third Party’s Asset Confiscation in Corruption Crime</title><creator>Supardi, Supardi</creator><subject lang="en-US">Asset Confiscation; The Third Party; Seizure; Bad Faith.</subject><description lang="en-US">The article is intended to analyze and find the idea of legal philosophy foundation  and develop the concept of proceeds confiscation of corruption crime are enjoyed by a third party, and find the ratio decidendi some of the verdicts related to asset confiscation to a third party without prior seizure, compared with asset confiscation that preceded seizure at the level of investigation. The article found three findings. First, the philosophy foundation of asset confiscation  against third parties is in order to maximize the return of state losses due to corruption. Second, the ratio decidendi verdicts related to assets confiscation to a third party without prior seizure, such that verdicts were not contrary to th laws, human rights and justice. The interpretation of the provisions of Article 19 in conjunction with Article 18 of Law Number 31 Year 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption Criminal as amended by Law Number 20 Year 2001 provides an opportunity asset confiscation  to a third party as long as  the third party is not good manner.  Third, to find advice  for legal reform of the provisions regarding  on confiscation to third party in corruption crime in order  that is not touch  with the third party’s rights as  a subjek of asset confiscation.</description><publisher lang="en-US">Universitas Airlangga</publisher><contributor lang="en-US"/><date>2018-10-01</date><type>Journal:Article</type><type>Other:info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</type><type>Journal:Article</type><type>File:application/pdf</type><identifier>http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/article/view/8427</identifier><identifier>10.20473/ydk.v33i3.8427</identifier><source lang="en-US">Yuridika; Vol 33, No 3 (2018): Volume 33 No 3 September 2018; 469-494</source><source>2528-3103</source><source>0215-840X</source><language>eng</language><relation>http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/article/view/8427/pdf_1</relation><rights lang="en-US">Copyright (c) 2018 Yuridika</rights><rights lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0</rights><recordID>article-8427</recordID></dc>
|
| language |
eng |
| format |
Journal:Article Journal Other:info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Other File:application/pdf File Journal:Journal |
| author |
Supardi, Supardi |
| title |
Third Party’s Asset Confiscation in Corruption Crime |
| publisher |
Universitas Airlangga |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| topic |
Asset Confiscation The Third Party Seizure Bad Faith |
| url |
http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/article/view/8427 http://e-journal.unair.ac.id/YDK/article/view/8427/pdf_1 |
| contents |
The article is intended to analyze and find the idea of legal philosophy foundation and develop the concept of proceeds confiscation of corruption crime are enjoyed by a third party, and find the ratio decidendi some of the verdicts related to asset confiscation to a third party without prior seizure, compared with asset confiscation that preceded seizure at the level of investigation. The article found three findings. First, the philosophy foundation of asset confiscation against third parties is in order to maximize the return of state losses due to corruption. Second, the ratio decidendi verdicts related to assets confiscation to a third party without prior seizure, such that verdicts were not contrary to th laws, human rights and justice. The interpretation of the provisions of Article 19 in conjunction with Article 18 of Law Number 31 Year 1999 on the Eradication of Corruption Criminal as amended by Law Number 20 Year 2001 provides an opportunity asset confiscation to a third party as long as the third party is not good manner. Third, to find advice for legal reform of the provisions regarding on confiscation to third party in corruption crime in order that is not touch with the third party’s rights as a subjek of asset confiscation. |
| id |
IOS3876.article-8427 |
| institution |
Universitas Airlangga |
| institution_id |
33 |
| institution_type |
library:university library |
| library |
Perpustakaan Universitas Airlangga |
| library_id |
468 |
| collection |
Yuridika |
| repository_id |
3876 |
| subject_area |
Law/Ilmu Hukum Criminal Law/Hukum Pidana Constitutional and Administrative Law/Hukum Tata Negara International Law/Hukum Internasional |
| city |
KOTA SURABAYA |
| province |
JAWA TIMUR |
| repoId |
IOS3876 |
| first_indexed |
2019-05-06T20:43:19Z |
| last_indexed |
2020-04-14T02:58:58Z |
| recordtype |
dc |
| _version_ |
1686057450803822592 |
| score |
17.60987 |