Elaboration on Public Administration Crises: An Endeavor in Seeking Scientifc Identity

Main Authors: Sutarna, Iwan Tanjung, Husna, Khuriyatul, Iswari, Paramita
Format: Article info application/pdf Journal
Bahasa: eng
Terbitan: Indonesian Association for Public Administration , 2017
Online Access: https://journal.iapa.or.id/pgr/article/view/21
https://journal.iapa.or.id/pgr/article/view/21/5
ctrlnum article-21
fullrecord <?xml version="1.0"?> <dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><title lang="en-US">Elaboration on Public Administration Crises: An Endeavor in Seeking Scientifc Identity</title><creator>Sutarna, Iwan Tanjung</creator><creator>Husna, Khuriyatul</creator><creator>Iswari, Paramita</creator><description lang="en-US">This paper aims to elaborate the crises occurring in the science of public administration based on signifcant conceptions of scholars. Public administration&#x2019;s initial emergence as a novel scientifc discipline sparked a theoretical-conceptual debate specifcally in the domain of epistemology. For the sake of systematical order, this paper is divided into three phases of crisis based on the dynamics of the theoretical-conceptual development of public administration, namely: (1) identity crisis; (2) paradigm crisis; and (3) intellectual crisis. The illustration of each crisis phase is aimed at conveying conception points of scientists which facilitates in reading the narrative of shifts and theoretical-conceptual contents including their inherent values. For this reason, a search or walkthrough of relevant literature is necessary to observe the development of thoughts in public administration.The study result shows that the di&#xFB00;ering ideas and argumentations which had occurred throughout every discussion on public administration have had implications on the heterogeneity of the public administration feld. The various shifts of locus-focus and paradigm in public administration is seen as a systematic atempt in fnding its true self as a scientifc discipline. The e&#xFB00;orts of public administration in separating itself from the shadows of political science was also observed, although being capable of truly separating itself is considered as extremely difcult, bearing in mind that the focus and locus of public administration is very much a&#xFB00;ected by constantly developing social political in&#xFB02;uences. In addition to that, various shifts of locus and focus seems to have empirical implications particularly in the scientifc scope of public administration.</description><publisher lang="en-US">Indonesian Association for Public Administration</publisher><date>2017-06-19</date><type>Journal:Article</type><type>Other:info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion</type><type>Journal:Article</type><type>File:application/pdf</type><identifier>https://journal.iapa.or.id/pgr/article/view/21</identifier><identifier>10.30589/pgr.v1i1.21</identifier><source lang="en-US">Policy &amp; Governance Review; Vol 1 No 1 (2017): January; 12-25</source><source>2580-4820</source><source>2580-3395</source><language>eng</language><relation>https://journal.iapa.or.id/pgr/article/view/21/5</relation><rights lang="en-US">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0</rights><recordID>article-21</recordID></dc>
language eng
format Journal:Article
Journal
Other:info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Other
File:application/pdf
File
Journal:Journal
author Sutarna, Iwan Tanjung
Husna, Khuriyatul
Iswari, Paramita
title Elaboration on Public Administration Crises: An Endeavor in Seeking Scientifc Identity
publisher Indonesian Association for Public Administration
publishDate 2017
url https://journal.iapa.or.id/pgr/article/view/21
https://journal.iapa.or.id/pgr/article/view/21/5
contents This paper aims to elaborate the crises occurring in the science of public administration based on signifcant conceptions of scholars. Public administration’s initial emergence as a novel scientifc discipline sparked a theoretical-conceptual debate specifcally in the domain of epistemology. For the sake of systematical order, this paper is divided into three phases of crisis based on the dynamics of the theoretical-conceptual development of public administration, namely: (1) identity crisis; (2) paradigm crisis; and (3) intellectual crisis. The illustration of each crisis phase is aimed at conveying conception points of scientists which facilitates in reading the narrative of shifts and theoretical-conceptual contents including their inherent values. For this reason, a search or walkthrough of relevant literature is necessary to observe the development of thoughts in public administration.The study result shows that the differing ideas and argumentations which had occurred throughout every discussion on public administration have had implications on the heterogeneity of the public administration feld. The various shifts of locus-focus and paradigm in public administration is seen as a systematic atempt in fnding its true self as a scientifc discipline. The efforts of public administration in separating itself from the shadows of political science was also observed, although being capable of truly separating itself is considered as extremely difcult, bearing in mind that the focus and locus of public administration is very much affected by constantly developing social political influences. In addition to that, various shifts of locus and focus seems to have empirical implications particularly in the scientifc scope of public administration.
id IOS4791.article-21
institution Universitas Gadjah Mada
affiliation onesearch.perpusnas.go.id
scopus.onesearch.id
institution_id 19
institution_type library:university
library
library Perpustakaan Pusat Universitas Gadjah Mada
library_id 488
collection Policy & Governance Review
repository_id 4791
subject_area policy analysis
public management
public policy
public administration
city SLEMAN
province DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA
shared_to_ipusnas_str 1
repoId IOS4791
first_indexed 2017-10-24T09:13:14Z
last_indexed 2019-05-07T21:43:19Z
recordtype dc
_version_ 1686257074190680064
score 17.607244