Grant review guide: top 6 ways to annoy a grant reviewer
| Main Authors: | Bar-Zeev, Yoram, Wachs, Yasmin |
|---|---|
| Format: | info lesson |
| Bahasa: | eng |
| Terbitan: |
, 2018
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
https://zenodo.org/record/1887735 |
| ctrlnum |
1887735 |
|---|---|
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><creator>Bar-Zeev, Yoram</creator><creator>Wachs, Yasmin</creator><date>2018-12-03</date><description>When submitting a grant proposal, our motivation is to have the reviewer on “our side” – enthusiastic and positive about our project. In the grant review context, this is largely so that reviewers will write a positive review. This is done to increase the chance that the grant is retained for funding by the funding agency. Knowing that reviewers have lots of grant applications to cover, and that time is always of the essence, we want to ease the reading and “help” the reviewer get a positive impression. Once the basic tips for grant writing are in place, we’ll want to ensure we avoid annoying the reviewers during the grant review process. To minimize such occurrences, we have collected the top 6 most annoying practices in grant writing. We highly advise applicants to avoid the following points.</description><identifier>https://zenodo.org/record/1887735</identifier><identifier>10.5281/zenodo.1887735</identifier><identifier>oai:zenodo.org:1887735</identifier><language>eng</language><relation>doi:10.5281/zenodo.1887734</relation><rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode</rights><subject>Horizon 2020</subject><subject>ERC</subject><subject>grant review guide</subject><subject>grant review</subject><subject>tips for grant writing</subject><subject>grant development</subject><title>Grant review guide: top 6 ways to annoy a grant reviewer</title><type>Other:info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture</type><type>Other:lesson</type><recordID>1887735</recordID></dc>
|
| language |
eng |
| format |
Other:info:eu-repo/semantics/lecture Other Other:lesson |
| author |
Bar-Zeev, Yoram Wachs, Yasmin |
| title |
Grant review guide: top 6 ways to annoy a grant reviewer |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| topic |
Horizon 2020 ERC grant review guide grant review tips for grant writing grant development |
| url |
https://zenodo.org/record/1887735 |
| contents |
When submitting a grant proposal, our motivation is to have the reviewer on “our side” – enthusiastic and positive about our project. In the grant review context, this is largely so that reviewers will write a positive review. This is done to increase the chance that the grant is retained for funding by the funding agency. Knowing that reviewers have lots of grant applications to cover, and that time is always of the essence, we want to ease the reading and “help” the reviewer get a positive impression. Once the basic tips for grant writing are in place, we’ll want to ensure we avoid annoying the reviewers during the grant review process. To minimize such occurrences, we have collected the top 6 most annoying practices in grant writing. We highly advise applicants to avoid the following points. |
| id |
IOS16997.1887735 |
| institution |
DEFAULT |
| institution_type |
library:public library |
| library |
DEFAULT |
| collection |
DEFAULT |
| city |
DEFAULT |
| province |
DEFAULT |
| repoId |
IOS16997 |
| first_indexed |
2022-06-06T03:00:03Z |
| last_indexed |
2022-06-06T03:00:03Z |
| recordtype |
dc |
| merged_child_boolean |
1 |
| _version_ |
1739491585026949120 |
| score |
17.607244 |