Perbandingan pengukuran model studi konvensional dengan model studi 3D hasil pemindaian laser = Comparison of measurements between conventional study models with Digital 3D study models from laser scanning
| Main Authors: | Ririt Damayanti, author, Add author: Nia Ayu Ismaniati, supervisor, Add author: Fadli Jazaldi, supervisor, Add author: Miesje Karmiati Purwanegara, examiner, Add author: Krisnawati, examiner, Add author: Benny M. Soegiharto, examiner |
|---|---|
| Format: | Masters Thesis |
| Terbitan: |
, 2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: |
https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20318259 |
| ctrlnum |
20318259 |
|---|---|
| fullrecord |
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<dc schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><type>Thesis:Masters</type><title>Perbandingan pengukuran model studi konvensional dengan model studi 3D hasil pemindaian laser = Comparison of measurements between conventional study models with Digital 3D study models from laser scanning</title><creator>Ririt Damayanti, author</creator><creator>Add author: Nia Ayu Ismaniati, supervisor</creator><creator>Add author: Fadli Jazaldi, supervisor</creator><creator>Add author: Miesje Karmiati Purwanegara, examiner</creator><creator>Add author: Krisnawati, examiner</creator><creator>Add author: Benny M. Soegiharto, examiner</creator><publisher/><date>2012</date><subject>Dental Care.</subject><description>[<b>ABSTRAK</b><br>
Penggunaan model studi digital di Indonesia saat ini belum populer,
akan tetapi adanya permasalahan kebutuhan penyimpanan ruangan, kebutuhan
penyajian rencana perawatan yang akurat dan belum adanya teknologi model studi
tiga dimensi digital di Indonesia menjadi alasan dilakukan penelitian ini. Penelitian
ini merupakan penelitian eksperimental dengan merakit pemindai laser dan
?benchmark? software tiga dimensi untuk kemudian membandingkan pengukuran
pada model studi secara manual dengan digital.
Material dan metode : Sampel yang digunakan sebanyak 12 pasang model gigi
paska perawatan ortodonti yang memiliki hubungan molar kelas I. Setiap model studi
dipindai menggunakan pemindai laser tiga dimensi. Hasil pemindaian kemudian
dilakukan pengukuran jarak mesiodistal, interkaninus, dan intermolar. Pengukuran
pada model studi konvensional menggunakan kaliper digital dengan ketelitian
0,01mm dan menggunakan software pada model digital. Masing-masing nilai
pengukuran dilakukan pengujian realibilitas (uji intraeksaminer) dengan uji T-test
berpasangan, kemudian nilai pengukuran secara digital dibandingkan dengan
pengukuran secara manual untuk dilakukan uji validitas menggunakan uji T-test tidak
berpasangan.
Hasil : Hasil uji intraeksaminer menunjukan tidak ada perbedaan yang bermakna
antara penghitungan pertama dan kedua dengan nilai p antara 0,07-0,701. Hasil T-test
tidak berpasangan menunjukan tidak ada perbedaan yang bermakna antara
pengukuran model studi digital dengan pengukuran model studi konvensional dengan
nilai selisih rata-rata lebar mesiodistal sebesar 0,09mm (SD=0,07), nilai rata-rata
selisih pengukuran jarak interkaninus 0,10 mm (SD=0,03) dan nilai rata-rata selisih
pengukuran jarak intermolar 0,08 mm (SD=0,03) dengan nilai p untuk semua jenis
pengukuran antara 0,62-0,99.
Kesimpulan : Perbandingan pengukuran secara manual dengan pengukuran pada
model studi digital hasil pemindaian laser 3D menunjukan perbedaan yang tidak
bermakna secara statistik.
<hr>
<b>ABSTRACT</b><br>
The use of digital study models in Indonesia is not popular, but
problem such as space required for study models storage, the needs of accurate
treatment planning and the absence of 3D digital study model technology in
Indonesia is the reason to do this research. This study is an experimental study by
assembling a 3D laser scanner with a 3D software "benchmark" and comparing the
manual and digital study models measurements.
Material and methods: The amount of samples used in this research was 12 pairs of
post-orthodontic treatment study models with class I molar relationship. Each of the
conventional study model was scanned and the mesiodistal, intercanine, and
intermolar width was measured. Measurement were made with a digital calliper to the
nearest 0.01 mm from conventional study models and with the software from the
digital model. Each measurement value was tested to know the realibilility
(intraexaminer test) using paired T-test, then the measurements of digital were
compared with measurements performed manually using unpaired t-tests to kwow the
validity.
Results: The intraexaminer test showed no significant difference between the first
and second measurements with p values between 0.07 to 0.701. The unpaired T-test
showed no significant difference between measurements of digital study models with
measurements of conventional models with the mean difference in mesiodistal width
0.09 mm (SD = 0.07), the mean difference of intercanine distance 0.10 mm (SD =
0.03) and the mean difference of intermolar distance 0.08 mm (SD = 0.03) with p
values for all types of measurement between 0.62 to 0.99.
Conclusion: Comparison of measurements between conventional study models with
digital study models from 3D laser scanning showed no significant difference.;The use of digital study models in Indonesia is not popular, but
problem such as space required for study models storage, the needs of accurate
treatment planning and the absence of 3D digital study model technology in
Indonesia is the reason to do this research. This study is an experimental study by
assembling a 3D laser scanner with a 3D software "benchmark" and comparing the
manual and digital study models measurements.
Material and methods: The amount of samples used in this research was 12 pairs of
post-orthodontic treatment study models with class I molar relationship. Each of the
conventional study model was scanned and the mesiodistal, intercanine, and
intermolar width was measured. Measurement were made with a digital calliper to the
nearest 0.01 mm from conventional study models and with the software from the
digital model. Each measurement value was tested to know the realibilility
(intraexaminer test) using paired T-test, then the measurements of digital were
compared with measurements performed manually using unpaired t-tests to kwow the
validity.
Results: The intraexaminer test showed no significant difference between the first
and second measurements with p values between 0.07 to 0.701. The unpaired T-test
showed no significant difference between measurements of digital study models with
measurements of conventional models with the mean difference in mesiodistal width
0.09 mm (SD = 0.07), the mean difference of intercanine distance 0.10 mm (SD =
0.03) and the mean difference of intermolar distance 0.08 mm (SD = 0.03) with p
values for all types of measurement between 0.62 to 0.99.
Conclusion: Comparison of measurements between conventional study models with
digital study models from 3D laser scanning showed no significant difference., The use of digital study models in Indonesia is not popular, but
problem such as space required for study models storage, the needs of accurate
treatment planning and the absence of 3D digital study model technology in
Indonesia is the reason to do this research. This study is an experimental study by
assembling a 3D laser scanner with a 3D software "benchmark" and comparing the
manual and digital study models measurements.
Material and methods: The amount of samples used in this research was 12 pairs of
post-orthodontic treatment study models with class I molar relationship. Each of the
conventional study model was scanned and the mesiodistal, intercanine, and
intermolar width was measured. Measurement were made with a digital calliper to the
nearest 0.01 mm from conventional study models and with the software from the
digital model. Each measurement value was tested to know the realibilility
(intraexaminer test) using paired T-test, then the measurements of digital were
compared with measurements performed manually using unpaired t-tests to kwow the
validity.
Results: The intraexaminer test showed no significant difference between the first
and second measurements with p values between 0.07 to 0.701. The unpaired T-test
showed no significant difference between measurements of digital study models with
measurements of conventional models with the mean difference in mesiodistal width
0.09 mm (SD = 0.07), the mean difference of intercanine distance 0.10 mm (SD =
0.03) and the mean difference of intermolar distance 0.08 mm (SD = 0.03) with p
values for all types of measurement between 0.62 to 0.99.
Conclusion: Comparison of measurements between conventional study models with
digital study models from 3D laser scanning showed no significant difference.]</description><identifier>https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20318259</identifier><recordID>20318259</recordID></dc>
|
| format |
Thesis:Masters Thesis Thesis:Thesis |
| author |
Ririt Damayanti, author Add author: Nia Ayu Ismaniati, supervisor Add author: Fadli Jazaldi, supervisor Add author: Miesje Karmiati Purwanegara, examiner Add author: Krisnawati, examiner Add author: Benny M. Soegiharto, examiner |
| title |
Perbandingan pengukuran model studi konvensional dengan model studi 3D hasil pemindaian laser = Comparison of measurements between conventional study models with Digital 3D study models from laser scanning |
| publishDate |
2012 |
| topic |
Dental Care |
| url |
https://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20318259 |
| contents |
[<b>ABSTRAK</b><br>
Penggunaan model studi digital di Indonesia saat ini belum populer,
akan tetapi adanya permasalahan kebutuhan penyimpanan ruangan, kebutuhan
penyajian rencana perawatan yang akurat dan belum adanya teknologi model studi
tiga dimensi digital di Indonesia menjadi alasan dilakukan penelitian ini. Penelitian
ini merupakan penelitian eksperimental dengan merakit pemindai laser dan
?benchmark? software tiga dimensi untuk kemudian membandingkan pengukuran
pada model studi secara manual dengan digital.
Material dan metode : Sampel yang digunakan sebanyak 12 pasang model gigi
paska perawatan ortodonti yang memiliki hubungan molar kelas I. Setiap model studi
dipindai menggunakan pemindai laser tiga dimensi. Hasil pemindaian kemudian
dilakukan pengukuran jarak mesiodistal, interkaninus, dan intermolar. Pengukuran
pada model studi konvensional menggunakan kaliper digital dengan ketelitian
0,01mm dan menggunakan software pada model digital. Masing-masing nilai
pengukuran dilakukan pengujian realibilitas (uji intraeksaminer) dengan uji T-test
berpasangan, kemudian nilai pengukuran secara digital dibandingkan dengan
pengukuran secara manual untuk dilakukan uji validitas menggunakan uji T-test tidak
berpasangan.
Hasil : Hasil uji intraeksaminer menunjukan tidak ada perbedaan yang bermakna
antara penghitungan pertama dan kedua dengan nilai p antara 0,07-0,701. Hasil T-test
tidak berpasangan menunjukan tidak ada perbedaan yang bermakna antara
pengukuran model studi digital dengan pengukuran model studi konvensional dengan
nilai selisih rata-rata lebar mesiodistal sebesar 0,09mm (SD=0,07), nilai rata-rata
selisih pengukuran jarak interkaninus 0,10 mm (SD=0,03) dan nilai rata-rata selisih
pengukuran jarak intermolar 0,08 mm (SD=0,03) dengan nilai p untuk semua jenis
pengukuran antara 0,62-0,99.
Kesimpulan : Perbandingan pengukuran secara manual dengan pengukuran pada
model studi digital hasil pemindaian laser 3D menunjukan perbedaan yang tidak
bermakna secara statistik.
<hr>
<b>ABSTRACT</b><br>
The use of digital study models in Indonesia is not popular, but
problem such as space required for study models storage, the needs of accurate
treatment planning and the absence of 3D digital study model technology in
Indonesia is the reason to do this research. This study is an experimental study by
assembling a 3D laser scanner with a 3D software "benchmark" and comparing the
manual and digital study models measurements.
Material and methods: The amount of samples used in this research was 12 pairs of
post-orthodontic treatment study models with class I molar relationship. Each of the
conventional study model was scanned and the mesiodistal, intercanine, and
intermolar width was measured. Measurement were made with a digital calliper to the
nearest 0.01 mm from conventional study models and with the software from the
digital model. Each measurement value was tested to know the realibilility
(intraexaminer test) using paired T-test, then the measurements of digital were
compared with measurements performed manually using unpaired t-tests to kwow the
validity.
Results: The intraexaminer test showed no significant difference between the first
and second measurements with p values between 0.07 to 0.701. The unpaired T-test
showed no significant difference between measurements of digital study models with
measurements of conventional models with the mean difference in mesiodistal width
0.09 mm (SD = 0.07), the mean difference of intercanine distance 0.10 mm (SD =
0.03) and the mean difference of intermolar distance 0.08 mm (SD = 0.03) with p
values for all types of measurement between 0.62 to 0.99.
Conclusion: Comparison of measurements between conventional study models with
digital study models from 3D laser scanning showed no significant difference.;The use of digital study models in Indonesia is not popular, but
problem such as space required for study models storage, the needs of accurate
treatment planning and the absence of 3D digital study model technology in
Indonesia is the reason to do this research. This study is an experimental study by
assembling a 3D laser scanner with a 3D software "benchmark" and comparing the
manual and digital study models measurements.
Material and methods: The amount of samples used in this research was 12 pairs of
post-orthodontic treatment study models with class I molar relationship. Each of the
conventional study model was scanned and the mesiodistal, intercanine, and
intermolar width was measured. Measurement were made with a digital calliper to the
nearest 0.01 mm from conventional study models and with the software from the
digital model. Each measurement value was tested to know the realibilility
(intraexaminer test) using paired T-test, then the measurements of digital were
compared with measurements performed manually using unpaired t-tests to kwow the
validity.
Results: The intraexaminer test showed no significant difference between the first
and second measurements with p values between 0.07 to 0.701. The unpaired T-test
showed no significant difference between measurements of digital study models with
measurements of conventional models with the mean difference in mesiodistal width
0.09 mm (SD = 0.07), the mean difference of intercanine distance 0.10 mm (SD =
0.03) and the mean difference of intermolar distance 0.08 mm (SD = 0.03) with p
values for all types of measurement between 0.62 to 0.99.
Conclusion: Comparison of measurements between conventional study models with
digital study models from 3D laser scanning showed no significant difference., The use of digital study models in Indonesia is not popular, but
problem such as space required for study models storage, the needs of accurate
treatment planning and the absence of 3D digital study model technology in
Indonesia is the reason to do this research. This study is an experimental study by
assembling a 3D laser scanner with a 3D software "benchmark" and comparing the
manual and digital study models measurements.
Material and methods: The amount of samples used in this research was 12 pairs of
post-orthodontic treatment study models with class I molar relationship. Each of the
conventional study model was scanned and the mesiodistal, intercanine, and
intermolar width was measured. Measurement were made with a digital calliper to the
nearest 0.01 mm from conventional study models and with the software from the
digital model. Each measurement value was tested to know the realibilility
(intraexaminer test) using paired T-test, then the measurements of digital were
compared with measurements performed manually using unpaired t-tests to kwow the
validity.
Results: The intraexaminer test showed no significant difference between the first
and second measurements with p values between 0.07 to 0.701. The unpaired T-test
showed no significant difference between measurements of digital study models with
measurements of conventional models with the mean difference in mesiodistal width
0.09 mm (SD = 0.07), the mean difference of intercanine distance 0.10 mm (SD =
0.03) and the mean difference of intermolar distance 0.08 mm (SD = 0.03) with p
values for all types of measurement between 0.62 to 0.99.
Conclusion: Comparison of measurements between conventional study models with
digital study models from 3D laser scanning showed no significant difference.] |
| id |
IOS18070.20318259 |
| institution |
Universitas Indonesia |
| institution_id |
51 |
| institution_type |
library:university library |
| library |
Perpustakaan Universitas Indonesia |
| library_id |
492 |
| collection |
Repository Tugas Akhir Universitas Indonesia |
| repository_id |
18070 |
| city |
KOTA DEPOK |
| province |
JAWA BARAT |
| repoId |
IOS18070 |
| first_indexed |
2022-12-14T06:16:18Z |
| last_indexed |
2022-12-14T06:16:18Z |
| recordtype |
dc |
| merged_child_boolean |
1 |
| _version_ |
1752198288989224960 |
| score |
17.607244 |